Is CIC empowered to prosecute for perjury? Court issues noticeDecember 23rd, 2011 - 10:56 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Dec 23 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Friday issued notice to the Department of Personnel Training (DOPT) on a plea seeking its direction on whether the Central Information Commission (CIC) was legally empowered to prosecute an entity or a person for the offence of perjury if false documents are filed before the commission.
A Delhi-based lawyer, Shanmuga Patro approached the Delhi High Court after being refused by CIC to initiate a criminal complaint against the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, its aides and affiliates, who, according to him, misled CIC by filing forged and fabricated documents in evidence and succeeded before CIC.
Justice V.K. Shali hearing the matter sought response from DOPT before the next date of hearing March 16, 2012.
Through the petition, Patro raised the issue as to whether the CIC could be treated as a court for prosecuting persons for the offence of perjury or not.
Patro, the petitioner, argued: ?If a person or entity is permitted to give false documents and evidence before CIC with impunity, then how can CIC be expected to enforce Right to Information??
The petitioner said that in June 2011, he approached CIC to institute proceedings under Section 340 of CrPC and sought initiation of criminal case against the foundation, its aides and affiliates for filing forged and fabricated documents in evidence before the panel.
In December 2011, CIC had refused to initiate prosecution for the offence of perjury against foundation and ordered that ?it has no powers to take action for perjury under Section 340 of CrPC?.
Based on the information and reports filed by Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, the CIC had in October 2010 declared that Rajiv Gandhi Foundation is not a `Public authority? in terms of RTI Act and is not bound to provide information under Right to Information Act.
Patro, however, alleged: ?While Rajiv Gandhi Foundation informed CIC that only about 4 percent of its revenue is received from Government, in reality it receives a greater percentage of its revenue from Government.?
Being aggrieved with CIC?s order of expressing inability to examine whether Rajiv Gandhi Foundation committed perjury or not, Shanmuga Patro approached the Delhi High Court.
?Outcome of this case will decide CIC?s powers to commence criminal cases against parties who have been committing perjury, offences against public justice and offences relating to documents given in evidence before CIC,? said Patro.
The petitioner in his petition also raised the question whether the Information Commissioners, including the CIC, could be treated as “public servants” within the definition of section 195 of the CrPC.
- Delhi High Court blast: Accused records statement - May 02, 2012
- 2G scam: Key points of order denying bail to telecom honchos - May 23, 2011
- Omar's troubles persist -- now over his remedy - Nov 28, 2011
- Graft charges framed against Virbhadra, wife (Second Lead) - Jun 25, 2012
- Trial judge free to examine Virbhadra in graft case: Court (Lead) - Jan 07, 2012
- Court notice to police for not filing FIR against Kumble - Jan 06, 2012
- SC moved challenging quashing of FIR against Yeddyurappa - Mar 21, 2012
- Maintenance laws misused by greedy: Court (Lead) - Jun 21, 2012
- Stay trial in graft cases with care: High court - Mar 30, 2011
- Supreme Court rejects Kanimozhi's bail plea - Jun 20, 2011
- Mohali Court acquits Badal family in disproportionate assets case - Oct 01, 2010
- Bofors case: Court defers decision on dropping Quattrocchi name (Lead) - Oct 24, 2009
- Did not tell CBI I knew of Swan Capital: Reliance official - Nov 15, 2011
- Prosecution against Quattrocchi unjustified: CBI tells court (Lead) - Oct 03, 2009
- Fake certificates scam: Court orders probe against vice chancellor - Apr 03, 2012
Tags: aides, cic, criminal case, criminal complaint, crpc, delhi high court, dopt, false documents, impunity, information commission, initiation, New Delhi, offence, perjury, petition, petitioner, plea, prosecution, rajiv gandhi foundation, right to information act