India’s 1998 n-tests were successful, assert scientists
September 24th, 2009 - 9:05 pm ICT by IANSMumbai, Sep 24 (IANS) The nuclear tests India conducted in May 1998 were fully successful and helped the country achieve capability to build fission and thermonuclear fusion weapons from low yields up to 200 kilo tonnes, two top scientists said Thursday.
Setting at rest all controversies generated recently over the tests, Anil Kakodkar, chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and R. Chidambaram, principal scientific advisor to the government, said the nuclear tests at Pokhran in Rajashtan had achieved the desired scientific objectives.
Their joint statement came after doubts were raised by two retired scientists, K. Santhanam and P.K. Iyengar, on the tests conducted May 11 and 13, 1998.
Kakodkar said that on the basis of the capability, India had the ability to meet national security requirements and did not require to conduct more such tests.
Elaborating, Chidambaram, the architect of Pokhran-II, said that several measurements had confirmed the yields of the tests.
Proving the point, he said that noted US seismologist Jack Evernden had made estimations of the tests taking into consideration geological and seismological differences between the test sites. They tallied with India’s results.
Chidambaram pointed out that several papers had been written on the test results and had been peer-reviewed in reputed international journals.
Now, India also had the computer simulation capability to predict the yields of nuclear weapons-fission, boosted fission and two-state thermonuclear, of designs related to the May 1998 tests.
He pointed out that even Iyengar, who is now questioning the tests’ outcome, had agreed with the yield of the tests. However, the conclusions drawn by him on the efficiency were “purely speculative in nature”, according to Chidambaram.
He wondered how, without the knowledge of the design, the nature of fission-fusion break-up and quantity of thermo-nuclear material, Iyengar could calculate the efficiency of fuel burnt as 10 percent.
“No one outside the design team had the data to calculate fission-fusion yield break-up or any other significant parameter related to fusion burnt,” he said.
- India's n-tests were success, no repeat needed: top scientists (Lead) - Sep 24, 2009
- Pokhran II was a success: Kakodkar - Sep 24, 2009
- Pokhran II was a success: Kakodkar (updated) - Sep 24, 2009
- 1998 tests perfect, no doubt about India's n-arsenal: Kakodkar (Lead) - Dec 13, 2009
- Controversy over Pokhran-II needless: PM (Lead) - Aug 29, 2009
- Army should be confident of India's nuclear arsenal: Kakodkar - Dec 13, 2009
- Defence Ministry rejects scientist's stand Pokhran II success, says nuke strength sufficient - Aug 27, 2009
- Now, Navy chief disagrees with DRDO scientist's Pokhran failure remark - Aug 27, 2009
- India must not sign CTBT as Pokhran II was not fully successful, says DRDO scientist - Aug 27, 2009
- Former NSA Brajesh Mishra says Pokhran II was successful - Aug 27, 2009
- M.K.Naryanan dismisses Santhanam's Pokhran-II 'failure' remark - Sep 20, 2009
- Nuclear scientist P.K. Iyengar dead (Lead) - Dec 21, 2011
- Atomic Energy Commission chief Kakodkar to retire Nov 30 - Oct 30, 2009
- Kalam defends India's nuclear deterrence capability (Second Lead) - Aug 27, 2009
- No need for Pokhran II controversy: PM - Aug 29, 2009
Tags: aec, atomic energy commission, computer simulation, controversies, fission fusion, international journals, iyengar, kilo, national security requirements, nuclear material, nuclear tests, nuclear weapons, pokhran, r chidambaram, santhanam, simulation capability, taking into consideration, test sites, thermo, thermonuclear fusion