High court takes serious note of grabbing army land
December 8th, 2011 - 11:50 pm ICT by IANSLucknow, Dec 8 (IANS) In what is being described as an unprecendented step, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court Thursday summoned Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary Anoop Misra to make personal appearance in a PIL alleging large-scale grabbing of land earmarked and used as the Indian Army firing range in Lucknow.
Besides the chief secretary, a bench headed by senior judge Justice Pradeep Kant has directed the state principal housing secretary Ravindra Singh, housing commissioner P.V. Jagmohan, Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) vice chairman Rajiv Agrawal as well as senior local military officials to appear before the court on Dec 14 and explain how a private developer was allowed to blatantly carry on with acquisition and occupation of land belonging to the firing range (in Arjunganj village) for nearly a century.
The court also took serious note of the mushrooming illegal construction on the said land, right under the nose of the administration, when it was widely known that the entire area was notified as a firing range and any human habitation would be exposed to life threatening perils there.
What irked the court even more was that its earlier interim order to stay the construction activity way back in July last was being openly flouted.
Significantly, the housing and town planning authorities turned a blind eye to the construction even after the local district magistrate had submitted a formal report confirming that the construction was grossly unlawful.
A powerful ruling party politician and a now ousted minister in the Mayawati cabinet were alleged to be backing the whole project.
Union government counsel Alok Mathur compared the illegal constructrion to threat to national security as the firing range was used not only by the Indian Army but also by other para-military forces for training purposes.
Counsel Prashant Chandra appearing for the respondents failed to put up any strong defence. He simply sought to plead that even as government agencies had been going ahead with their construction in the area, his client, a private developer, was being targetted.
As state standing counsel Shobhit Shukla informed the court that all construction activity had been brought to a standstill, the senior judge ordered personal appearance of the chief secretary and other top officials on Dec 14.
- Rajasekhara Reddy's widow withdraws plea from apex court - Jan 17, 2012
- A judge's conduct should be exemplary: Supreme Court - May 27, 2011
- Apex court slams civic officials for illegal constructions - Jun 01, 2011
- Punjab's elite-60 under HC lens over land dealings (Punjab Newsletter) - May 25, 2012
- Charges against Dinakaran modified, apex court told - May 19, 2011
- Delhi High Court directs DDA to take encroached land back - May 02, 2012
- Apex court stays cancellation of Jaipur's Jal Mahal lease (Lead) - May 25, 2012
- Dinakaran's case may go to larger Supreme Court bench - May 26, 2011
- Apex court issues notices on Jaipur's Jal Mahal lease - May 25, 2012
- Adarsh scam: Money laundering case against 14 accused - Apr 30, 2012
- Court stops defence construction on Delhi ridge - Dec 05, 2011
- High court pulls up Gujarat jail authorities - Mar 15, 2011
- Larger bench to hear Yeddyurappa's plea against prosecution - Jul 18, 2011
- Apex court stays 'strange, surprising' Babri verdict (Intro Roundup) - May 09, 2011
- Rita Bahuguna's plea sent to high court chief justice - Nov 08, 2011
Tags: allahabad high court, chief secretary, construction activity, district magistrate, firing range, government counsel, housing commissioner, human habitation, illegal construction, indian army, local district, lucknow development authority, lucknow development authority lda, misra, personal appearance, planning authorities, private developer, ravindra, strong defence, union government