High court reserves order on Jamiat pleaJuly 9th, 2011 - 12:36 am ICT by IANS
Gandhinagar, July 8 (IANS) The Gujarat High Court Friday reserved its order on Jamiat- e-ulema-e-Hind’s (JUH) application challenging Nanavati-Mehta judicial inquiry commission’s order which rejected its plea of striking off senior IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s deposition from the record.
The division bench comprising Chief Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya and Justice Akil Kureshi also decided to keep Jan Sangharsh Manch’s (JSM) petition for questioning former Gujarat home minister Gordhan Zadafia to dispose with the same.
JUH had contended that the commission has to decide Bhatt’s status while claiming that Bhatt is not a witness.
It was argued that Bhatt was summoned by the panel to furnish information about his claim of having attended the meetings held at the chief minister’s residence on Feb 27, 2002.
JUH’s lawyer Krishnakant Vakharia had argued that no oath was administered to Bhatt for purpose of his examination as contemplated under section 4(a) of the Commission of Inquires Act. Further that under provisions of section 5(2) of the said Act, the commission has powers to ask any person to furnish information on such points or matters as it may think useful or relevant for the inquiry.
During the hearing Friday, the court asked JUH’s lawyer Krishnakant Vakharia as to why they were so eager to strike off Bhatt’s deposition.
JSM had earlier filed a petition in the high court for directions to the commission to summon the chief minister, three of his staff members in CMO, Gordhan Zadafia and others for cross examination.
JSM’s lawyer Mukul Sinha maintained that if the court permits the government to question Bhatt then JSM should also be allowed to question Zadafia, alleging that the probe panel has double standards. He submitted that on one hand the commission allowed questions to be asked to Bhatt and on the other refused JSM to examine Zadafia.
While making clear the commission’s stand on Bhatt’s questioning, advocate general Kamal Trivedi submitted that the commission considers Bhatt as an informer and only allowed examining of him by others to ensure the truth comes out.
- Godhra probe panel summons Sanjiv Bhatt - Apr 27, 2011
- Nanavati-Mehta panel allows cross-examination of Sanjiv Bhatt - May 09, 2011
- Gujarat riots panel to decide on cop's testimony June 8 - May 25, 2011
- Nanavati panel again asked to summon Modi - Aug 13, 2010
- Modi tried to undermine court proceeding, top cop tells panel - May 23, 2011
- Gujarat riots: Panel's refusal to quiz ex-minister to be challenged - Oct 04, 2010
- Modi did not take action despite information: Gujarat cop - May 16, 2011
- Ex-minister fails to appear before Gujarat riots panel - Sep 05, 2011
- Gujarat Congress wants key documents on 2002 riots - Jun 14, 2011
- Questioning of ex-officials on Gujarat riots put off - Aug 10, 2011
- Court decision Feb 23 on riot panel summons to Modi - Feb 11, 2011
- Court queries NGO on non-summoning of Modi by riots panel - Feb 23, 2011
- Apex court notice on plea to summon Modi before riots panel - Mar 19, 2012
- Court query on Gujarat cop's testimony before riots panel - Jun 30, 2011
- Details sought on Zadafia's appearance before Gujarat riots panel - Nov 24, 2010
Tags: advocate general, akil, chief justice, chief minister, court reserves, cross examination, division bench, gujarat high court, home minister, ips officer, jsm, judicial inquiry commission, juh, kamal, kureshi, mehta, nanavati, sangharsh, sanjiv, trivedi