Government gets 3 weeks to explain why no OBC census
April 12th, 2010 - 8:35 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, April 12 (IANS) The central government Monday assured the Supreme Court it would respond within three weeks to a public interest lawsuit that seeks a separate headcount of people belonging to backward classes.
The fresh lawsuit for enumeration of people of other backward classes (OBC) came up for hearing before a bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice Deepak Verma.
Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam pleaded before the court that it should wait for three weeks for the government reply before issuing a notice.
The bench accordingly adjourned the matter to be listed after three weeks.
The lawsuit was filed by Mahatma Phule Samta Parishad, a civil society working for the progress of OBC people of Vidharbha region of Maharashtra.
The lawsuit drafted by advocate Shivpujan Singh sought direction to the central government to ensure separate headcount of OBC people in the latest census which began April 1 this year.
Singh argued that a separate OBC census will ensure better planning for the progress of that group of people.
The lawsuit said a separate OBC headcount is also required to silence the critics of reservation for OBC in educational institutions and government jobs.
The headcount will help counter opposition to OBC quota on the ground that their exact population is not known.
Singh pointed out to the court that the government used to have a separate headcount of OBC population in the country till 1931, when it suddenly discontinued the process of caste-based census.
He claimed Article 340 of the constitution, adopted by the country two decades later, provided for caste-based census.
The government continues the practice of not undertaking OBC headcount in “utter digress and flagrant violation of Article 15, Article 14, Article 340 and various other provisions of the constitution”, the lawsuit said.
Singh contended that he is not seeking a caste-based census per se but a census to determine the population of socially and educationally backward classes just like people from the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes are counted separately.
- Caste census should ensure scientific count of OBCs: CPI-M - Aug 12, 2010
- Government's decision on caste-based census soon: PM (Lead) - May 07, 2010
- Most parties favour caste-based census (Lead) - May 06, 2010
- 'Volcanic eruption' if no caste-based census: Sharad Yadav - May 06, 2010
- Cabinet tosses caste-based census demand to ministers' group (Second Lead) - May 26, 2010
- Is counting the caste good or bad? India is divided - May 31, 2010
- Munde, Yadav trio meet Pranab on caste-based census - May 07, 2010
- Caste-based census not possible at present stage: Moily - May 03, 2010
- 'Caste should be included in census' - Aug 06, 2010
- Government decision on caste-based census soon: PM - May 07, 2010
- Decision on caste based census soon: PM - May 07, 2010
- Caste-based census, n-liability bill generate heat on budget session's last day (Parliament Roundup) - May 07, 2010
- Caste census modalities not decided: Pranab (Second Lead) - Aug 12, 2010
- UP politics still 'caste' in stone - Feb 08, 2012
- Minority quota a poll stunt: BJP - Dec 23, 2011
Tags: article 14, caste, central government, chief justice, deepak verma, educational institutions, exact population, flagrant violation, gopal, government jobs, government reply, headcount, k g balakrishnan, mahatma phule, New Delhi, obc, public interest, samta, solicitor general, subramaniam