Framing of charges against Sheila Kaul deferredFebruary 28th, 2012 - 7:30 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi Feb 28 (IANS) A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court deferred to March 27 its hearing on framing of charges against former union urban development minister Sheila Kaul and her two aides for their alleged involvement in a 1996 housing scam case.
Special CBI Court Judge Pradeep Chaddah has found prima facie evidence against Kaul, her then additional private secretary Rajan Lala and private assistant R.K. Sharma.
According to the prosecution, Kaul and her two aides had entered into a conspiracy to allot government accommodation on receiving illegal gratification.
The CBI has booked the three under various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code in its charge sheet filed April 2003.
- Court exempts Sheila Kaul from personal appearance - May 23, 2012
- 98-year-old Sheila Kaul told to appear in court - May 10, 2012
- Delhi land scam: Charges to be framed against 10 accused - May 05, 2012
- 2G scam: Framing of charges against 17 accused Saturday - Oct 21, 2011
- Trial in 2G scam to begin Friday - Nov 10, 2011
- 2G scam: Order on charges against the 17 accused Oct 22 - Oct 14, 2011
- Jaya Jaitley to stand trial in 'defence deal' case (Lead) - Mar 05, 2012
- 2G scam: 17 accused end arguments on charges - Aug 25, 2011
- Raja, others charged in 2G case - Oct 22, 2011
- Delhi HC blast: Court finds evidence against accused - Sep 04, 2012
- CWG graft case: Court notice to CBI on Reddy's bail plea - Feb 29, 2012
- Kanimozhi, Sharad Kumar's bail pleas dismissed (Second Lead) - Jun 08, 2011
- Criminal breach of trust, conspiracy charge not valid: Kanimozhi - Oct 01, 2011
- Talwars charged with Aarushi, Hemraj murders (Second Lead) - May 24, 2012
- Court frames corruption charges against former minister Thungan - Feb 02, 2009
Tags: aides, cbi court, central bureau of investigation, conspiracy, court judge, development minister, gratification, indian penal code, kaul, lala, New Delhi, pradeep, prevention of corruption act, prima facie evidence, private secretary, prosecution, provisions, scam case, sheila, urban development