Court slams back-door entry into Uttar Pradesh upper houseApril 12th, 2010 - 4:32 pm ICT by IANS
Lucknow, April 12 (IANS) The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court has slammed the Uttar Pradesh government for an apparent attempt to circumvent the constitution while arranging a “back-door entry” for nine upper house members nominated in 2003.
Though the term of these nine members has expired, the court passed strong remarks against the manner in which constitutional provisions for nomination of eminent persons from different fields were ignored.
“It was like a back-door entry into the august house,” a bench comprising Senior Judge Pradeep Kant and Justice Shabiul Hasnain ruled.
The issue was raised through a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by local activist and lawyer B.K. Singh, questioning the manner in which nine nominations were made by the Mayawati government to the state legislative council in 2003.
“The judiciary has no business to go into the qualifications and credentials of persons who have been nominated to the council, but the court cannot remain silent if there was an apparent attempt to circumvent the constitution,” the bench said in an order passed Friday but shared with the media Monday.
“What has been done clearly appears to be against the spirit of the Indian constitution,” the court held.
Referring to the petition, the bench said: “From the records furnished by the petitioner before the court, it was quite evident that none of the nine persons nominated to the upper house had any special qualifications, experience or achievements as envisaged under the constitution for the nominated categories.”
“The nominations were to be made under the provisions of… constitution, whereby eminent persons from the field of art, culture, science, cooperative movement or social work could be nominated to the upper house,” the court said.
The court also expressed surprise that even the state governor did not care to return the recommendations to the government for reconsideration.
- Plea against Tendulkar's Rajya Sabha nomination dismissed (Lead) - May 14, 2012
- Court clears Tendulkar's oath-taking in Rajya Sabha - May 16, 2012
- SC dismiss petition against Tendulkar's Rajya Sabha nomination - May 14, 2012
- Taj Corridor case reverted to original bench after drama - Feb 25, 2010
- Court notice to Bharti Walmart - Jul 11, 2012
- Few telecom firms giving 3G services illegally: Petition - Sep 28, 2011
- Bill that will allow foreign law firms through back door (Comment) - Aug 18, 2011
- PPP nominates Makhdoom Shahbuddin as new PM - Jun 20, 2012
- Court rejects CBI probe plea in medical officer's death - Jun 24, 2011
- Plea on apex court lawyers dismissed (Lead) - Feb 13, 2012
- UP governor okays bill extending Lokayukta's term - Jul 07, 2012
- Government forwards Afzal Guru mercy plea to president - Aug 10, 2011
- High court orders probe in Amar Singh's financial affairs - May 20, 2011
- President approves Tendulkar, Rekha's nomination to Rajya Sabha (Lead) - Apr 27, 2012
- Huge case backlog before Supreme Court's constitution bench - Jun 15, 2011
Tags: activist, apparent attempt, art culture, back door, bench, constitutional provisions, cooperative movement, eminent persons, hasnain, indian constitution, judiciary, kant, legislative council, petitioner, public interest litigation, slams, social work, state governor, upper house, uttar pradesh government