Court seeks public apology for defaming women
March 11th, 2011 - 10:21 pm ICT by IANSGandhinagar, March 11 (IANS) The first bench of the Gujarat High Court Friday declined to accept a man’s oral apology and told him to “apologize to women at large in public” for making baseless allegations and accusations against them.
The bench comprising Chief Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya and Justice K.M. Thaker was hearing a review petition of Dashrath Devda, who has been slapped with Rs.1 lakh cost for filing a frivolous public interest litigation. He had earlier sought introduction of a new law for protection of husbands against “atrocity by wives” and amendment in the existing law.
The chief justice told Devda: “You have insulted women at large. There are news reports that you’ve been asking people to help you and collecting money in name of the court’s order. As you stood on cross roads and sought money from public for paying for your mistake, you should apologize to the women at large in public.”
The chief justice asked Devda to go to the media and place an advertisement, if he thought fit, to bring it to public notice about his unconditional and unqualified apology.
The chief justice seemed angry at Devda who came to the court with around 40 women and men who he claimed were ‘victims’ of the existing law for protection of women.
“We would initiate contempt proceedings if any of these women would raise their voice and interfere in the court proceedings. You don’t know what a court is and what a judge is,” said the chief justice. The further hearing has been posted for March 30.
Devda had filed the PIL claiming that there was an urgent need of a protective law for husbands against cruelty by wives. The petitioners also sought amendment in the Indian Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code.
The bench had fined Devda, who is president of Akhil Bharatiya Patni Atyachar Virodhi Sangh (also known as All India Wives Cruelty Opposition Union) for filing a frivolous petition. The bench has stated that it was an attempt to seek media attention and publicity.
Later, there were media reports that he was ‘begging’ to the public to help him.
The high court earlier had initiated contempt proceedings in a separate case against Devda for carrying out demonstrations and shouting slogans against the family court, high court and the apex court. A judge of family court, K.M. Vin had filed the contempt petition.
The high court in 2005 had awarded Devda one month imprisonment and Rs.5,000 fine for contempt of court. In that case, the court had suggested to him to tender unconditional apology but he had refused. The court had noted that it was nothing but his arrogance and prejudice against the family court.
- Frivolous petitioner told to pay Rs.1 lakh - Nov 25, 2010
- Tamil magazine to apologise to Jayalalithaa for defaming her - Jan 13, 2012
- Lawyer behind Yeddyurappa arrest faces contempt case - Oct 15, 2011
- Land reclaimed after mosque demolition, DDA tells court (Lead) - Jan 14, 2011
- Two contempt pleas against Modi on Lokayukta issue - Sep 05, 2011
- Who leaked Modi's letter to PM, asks court - Sep 07, 2011
- Paternity suit: Court slams N.D. Tiwari on affidavit (Second Lead) - Jul 14, 2011
- Plea alleging misconduct by Gujarat judge withdrawn - Aug 26, 2010
- Delhi government, DDA, MCD get contempt of court notice - Nov 24, 2011
- Lawyer questioned for criticising Shivani case judge (Lead) - Oct 24, 2011
- Cop's front-rolls: No contempt case against official (Second Lead) - Feb 15, 2012
- Delhi High Court asks DU college teachers to end strike - Mar 16, 2011
- Court seeks land details of Jor Bagh shrine (Lead) - Feb 01, 2012
- Court sets aside contempt order against IFCI CEO - Apr 17, 2012
- Court allows prayers at demolished mosque site (Lead) - Jan 17, 2011
Tags: accusations, allegations, atrocity, chief justice, contempt proceedings, court proceedings, cross roads, devda, first bench, gujarat high court, indian penal code, march 11, news reports, petitioners, pil, public apology, public interest litigation, rs 1, thaker, women and men