Court reserves order on sharing officials’ appraisal reports (Lead)February 7th, 2012 - 10:33 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Feb 7 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Tuesday reserved its order on a plea that government employees’ performance appraisal reports, officially known as the annual confidential report (ACR), should be available under the Right to Information (RTI) Act in “public interest”.
RTI activist and petitioner R.K. Jain raised the question whether an ACR relating to his public duty can be termed as his “personal information” and whether their disclosure will infringe on his privacy.
According to a circular issued by the ministry of personnel and public grievances in 2007, “an ACR contains information about the character, capability and other attributes of the officials, disclosures of which to any other person would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy”.
ACRs are the basis on which the officials’ increments are given. Officials are rated as “extraordinary/very good/good/poor”. In order to be promoted, the assessee would have to earn an “extraordinary” or “very good” thrice.
Stating that under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, only personal information is exempted from public disclosure, the petitioner argued that ACRs do not come under this category.
The petitioner, who is also the editor of the Excise Law Times, challenged the earlier order, adding that “larger public interest warrants disclosure of all ACRs, when required, under the RTI Act”.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner, argued: “The ACRs contain no personal information of the officer concerned, except date of birth, date of joining government, employment code, job qualifications and courses attended during the period which is merely routine data about the officer and available otherwise as well.”
Bhushan said “only those information, which relate to personal information ‘which has no relation to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of the individual’, is exempted from disclosure”.
“And the information pertaining to performance of the public duty of a public servant cannot to be exempted from disclosure under the RTI Act,” Bhushan added.
Manisha Dhir, counsel for central government, opposed the plea saying ACRs were exempted from disclosure as these were related to personal information on public servant.
- Court reserves order on officials' appraisal reports - Feb 07, 2012
- Plea to make officials' appraisal reports public - Jan 15, 2012
- Court stays order to make president's donations public - Jul 13, 2012
- President comes under RTI, make donations public: Court (Lead) - Jun 14, 2012
- Gujarat officer challenges order for disclosure of assets - Nov 17, 2010
- PM calls for critical look at RTI, BJP objects - Oct 14, 2011
- Court dismisses petition to include CBI under RTI - Sep 10, 2011
- Whistleblowers bill likely to come in Rajya Sabha Tuesday - Aug 13, 2012
- Court blocks Narayanan-Vajpayee letters on Gujarat riots (Lead) - Jul 11, 2012
- Activists demand public audit for all government expenditure - Mar 12, 2011
- Court suspends order to Delhi Police to provide Bhushan CD - Dec 09, 2011
- Delhi transit system comes under RTI Act: High court - Jul 08, 2012
- 'Penalty imposed for denial of information unjustified' - Dec 17, 2010
- Court notice to government on CBI exemption from RTI - Jul 06, 2011
- Answer-sheets covered under RTI: Punjab information panel - May 27, 2010
Tags: acrs, appraisal reports, confidential report, court reserves, delhi high court, excise law times, government employees, government employment, interest warrants, invasion of privacy, ministry of personnel, performance appraisal, petitioner, prashant, public disclosure, public grievances, r k jain, routine data, rti act, unwarranted invasion