Court reserves order on officials’ appraisal reports
February 7th, 2012 - 4:57 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Feb 7 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Tuesday reserved its order on a plea that performance appraisal reports of government staffers, officially known as the Annual Confidential Report (ACR), should be available under the Right to Information (RTI) Act in “public interest”.
The petitioner — RTI activist R.K. Jain — has raised the question whether performance appraisal reports of a government employee relating to his public duty can be termed as his “personal information” and whether their disclosure will infringe on his privacy.
According to a circular issued by the ministry of personnel and public grievances in 2007, “an ACR contains information about the character, capability and other attributes of the officials, disclosures of which to any other person would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy”.
ACRs are the basis on which the officials’ increments are given. Officials are rated as “extraordinary/very good/good/poor”. In order to be promoted, the assessee would have to earn an “extraordinary” or “very good” thrice.
Stating that under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, only personal information is exempted from public disclosure, the petitioner argued that ACRs do not come under this category.
The petitioner, who is also the editor of the Excise Law Times, challenged the earlier order, adding that “larger public interest warrants disclosure of all ACRs, when required, under the RTI Act”.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner, argued: “The ACRs contain no personal information of the officer concerned, except date of birth, date of joining government, employment code, job qualifications and courses attended during the period which is merely routine data about the officer and available otherwise as well.”
–Indo-Asian news Service
gt/am/vt
- Plea to make officials' appraisal reports public - Jan 15, 2012
- Court reserves order on sharing officials' appraisal reports (Lead) - Feb 07, 2012
- Gujarat officer challenges order for disclosure of assets - Nov 17, 2010
- Don't allow RTI misuse: Apex court (Lead) - Aug 12, 2011
- Answer-sheets covered under RTI: Punjab information panel - May 27, 2010
- Is CIC empowered to prosecute for perjury? Court issues notice - Dec 23, 2011
- PM calls for critical look at RTI, BJP objects - Oct 14, 2011
- Court stays information panel's order to RBI on RTI plea - Dec 09, 2011
- Court notice to government on CBI exemption from RTI - Jul 06, 2011
- Court asks Goa governor not to stall RTI queries - Jun 06, 2011
- Court dismisses petition to include CBI under RTI - Sep 10, 2011
- School marks can't be revealed under RTI: Court - May 27, 2012
- Income tax returns, medical records not under RTI: court - Jan 12, 2010
- Bihar official demands huge amount for information under RTI - Dec 03, 2009
- Student's plea against central board rejected - Sep 03, 2011
Tags: acrs, asian news, confidential report, court reserves, delhi high court, excise law times, government employee, government employment, interest warrants, invasion of privacy, ministry of personnel, performance appraisal, petitioner, prashant, public disclosure, public grievances, r k jain, routine data, service gt, unwarranted invasion