Court pulls up parents for meddling in daughter’s lifeFebruary 19th, 2011 - 11:01 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Feb 19 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Saturday rapped parents who, instead of helping to solve the problems in their daughters’ married life, tried to fuel the flame and made the situation worse. The observation came while Justice Kailash Gambhir upheld a Delhi court’s decree of allowing divorce to a man on the ground that his in-laws’ were frequently interfering in his marital life.
Justice Gambhir said parents should draw a line to let their daughters lead happy married lives.
“The present case is an unfortunate example where the parents of the appellant, instead of putting out the fire, have fuelled and fanned it,” the court said, dismissing an appeal filed by the wife challenging Delhi court’s earlier order delivered in June 2003, granting the man decree of divorce.
“All parents guide, teach and discipline their daughters and are concerned about their welfare after marriage. But it is imperative for parents to draw a line as the prime concern should be that their daughter is happily settled in a new atmosphere at the husband’s place,” he said.
Justice Gambhir added: “But, it should not mean day-to-day monitoring of the affairs taking place at the matrimonial home of the daughter.”
“Parents should not become uninvited judges of problems of their daughter, become an obstacle in the daughter’s married life, plant thoughts in her mind and gain control over her and promote disharmony in her family life,” said the court.
“They are expected to advise, support and believe in their upbringing, maintaining a discreet silence about the affairs of the matrimonial relationship,” the court observed.
Earlier, in 2003, a Delhi court had allowed the husband’s plea seeking decree of divorce on the grounds of cruel conduct by his wife due to continuous interference by his in-laws.
The two got married April 13, 1990, at Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies.
According to the husband, the differences with his wife started a few months after their marriage due to frequent interference of his in-laws.
- On the rise: Divorces under 25 - Dec 29, 2011
- Can't ignore kin's evidence in matrimonial dispute: SC - Jul 05, 2012
- Bail plea of man held for wife's death rejected - Apr 11, 2011
- Court sets aside divorce granted to man - Apr 11, 2011
- After 30 years, 85-year-old granted divorce - Jan 13, 2011
- Few isolated incidents in marriage not cruelty: Apex court - Oct 08, 2010
- Police take Agra woman back to husband in Kerala - Nov 01, 2010
- Court tells police to trace, reunite minor boy with mother (Lead) - Dec 13, 2011
- Delhi High Court comes to aid of in-laws - Jul 29, 2010
- CRPF trooper's wife found dead, dowry case filed - May 25, 2012
- Dowry death: Victim's brothers-in-law get anticipatory bail - Jun 22, 2012
- Dowry death: Victim's mother-in-law told to surrender - Jun 20, 2012
- Forget about freedom, apex court tells married men - Jun 10, 2010
- Changes in marriage law welcome, says women - Mar 25, 2012
- Court acquits man accused of torturing daughter-in-law - Jun 28, 2011
Tags: continuous interference, delhi court, delhi high court, discreet silence, disharmony, flame, gain control, gambhir, hindu rites, kailash, married life, matrimonial home, matrimonial relationship, New Delhi, observation, obstacle, plea, prime concern, unfortunate example, upbringing