Court calls for amicable settlement of Ayodhya dispute
September 14th, 2010 - 2:26 am ICT by IANSLucknow, Sep 14 (IANS) The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court Monday called upon the rival parties to explore the possibility of a last-minute amicable settlement of the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute.
The order was passed on an application moved by senior advocate Prashant Chandra on the 125-year old litigation over claims by Hindus and Muslims to the disputed site in Ayodhya.
Even as a three-judge special bench of the high court is to pronounce the verdict in the case Sep 24, Justice Dharam Veer Sharma chose to hear the application and pass an order.
The high court registry had refused to accept the application on the ground that only one of the three judges was available as the other two Justice S.U. Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal were currently holding court in Allahabad.
While issuing the order, Justice Sharma emphasised a 1994 ruling by a five-judge Supreme Court bench on a petition moved by M. Ismail Farooqui against acquisition of all land by the union government in and around the disputed Ayodhya site after the demolition of the 16th century Babri Mosque in December 1992.
The apex court had then favoured an amicable settlement of the issue.
The case was cited by the petitioner Ramesh Chandra Tripathi, who aroused apprehensions that any verdict at this juncture could vitiate the communal environment across the country.
Prashant Chandra argued that the fallout of the judgement could adversely affect the forthcoming Commonwealth Games, hence it was advisable to postpone the verdict for now.
Emphasising that the Supreme Court ruling needed to be adhered to by all courts across the country, Justice Sharma ordered that the application be placed before the full three-judge bench Sep 16.
Earlier in the day, advocates Neeraj Kumar Srivastava and Jaspreet Singh had prepared separate applications urging the court to defer the verdict, expressing fears that the judgement could vitiate the communal environment across the country.
“In view of the prevailing situation across the country, we are seeking postponement of the verdict scheduled to be pronounced Sep 24,” Srivastava told reporters here.
Rival claims by Hindu and Muslim groups to the site led to the demolition of the 16th century Babri Masjid by Hindu mobs Dec 6, 1992, triggering widespread communal violence that left thousands dead across the country.
- High court to be urged to defer Ayodhya verdict - Sep 14, 2010
- I want to save nation from chaos: Ayodhya petitioner - Sep 16, 2010
- Apex court defers Ayodhya verdict till Sep 28 (Lead) - Sep 23, 2010
- Status quo at Ayodhya site extended till Aug 31 (Lead) - Apr 28, 2011
- Alert sounded in Bihar ahead of Ayodhya verdict - Sep 21, 2010
- Hearing on plea for delaying Ayodhya verdict put off (Third Lead) - Sep 22, 2010
- Apex court stays Ayodhya verdict till Sep 28 (Second Lead) - Sep 23, 2010
- Apex court's Ayodhya decision welcomed by all (Roundup) - Sep 28, 2010
- Justice Sharma issues dissenting note; favours conciliation in Ayodhya land dispute case - Sep 20, 2010
- Apex court defers hearing on plea for delaying Ayodhya verdict (Second Lead) - Sep 22, 2010
- Supreme Court defers hearing on Ayodhya plea (Lead) - Sep 22, 2010
- More security to judges ahead of Ayodhya verdict - Sep 13, 2010
- No amicable solution or delaying Ayodhya verdict: Court (Night Lead) - Sep 18, 2010
- Supreme Court to hear Ayodhya verdict deferment plea today - Sep 28, 2010
- Sonia Gandhi appeals for peace following Ayodhya verdict - Sep 29, 2010
Tags: allahabad high court, amicable settlement, apex court, apprehensions, chandra, commonwealth games, communal environment, country justice, farooqui, hindus and muslims, jaspreet singh, juncture, petitioner, rival parties, srivastava, sudhir, supreme court bench, supreme court ruling, tripathi, union government