CIC asks apex court to reveal which minister pressurised judge
November 25th, 2009 - 9:56 pm ICT by IANS ( Leave a comment )New Delhi, Nov 25 (IANS) The Central Information Commission (CIC) has asked the Supreme Court to reveal the name of the minister who tried to influence the decision of Madras High Court judge R. Reghupati earlier this year.
The decision came on a Right to Information (RTI) application filed by activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal who had asked for complete correspondence between Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan and the Madras High Court judge R. Reghupati involving the issue of a union minister approaching the latter through a lawyer to influence his judicial decisions.
Agrawal had also asked the name of the union minister who tried to influence Reghupati and the name of the advocate who approached Reghupati on behalf of the minister.
However, the apex court official Rajpal Arora denied the information sought, stating that the information was “neither maintained nor available”.
Agrawal then approached the first appellate authority which also denied him the information. He then filed an appeal with the CIC.
“…we are not convinced that the disclosure of information sought by appellant S.C. Agrawal would in any way infringe on the constitutional stature of justices of the high court or indeed in any way diminish the exalted status that we readily concede is granted to him in a democracy such as ours,” said Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah in his order.
“The implication in this appeal is that, in fact, there has been an attempt to diminish that exalted status by unseemly pressure and the information sought is a means to expose such an unworthy attempt, if any,” Habibullah noted.
The information will now be provided to Agrawal within 15 working days of the date of receipt of this decision.
- CIC asks apex court for information on judges' elevation - Nov 25, 2009
- Ministers' assets: RTI activist says PMO withholding details - Aug 29, 2010
- India-Pakistan 1963 talks: CIC to see if files stay secret - Apr 13, 2010
- Did not suppress Madras High Court chief's report: Balakrishnan - Dec 15, 2010
- About 20,000 RTI applications pending - Mar 11, 2011
- 'Penalty imposed for denial of information unjustified' - Dec 17, 2010
- Why is Habibullah still chief CIC, ask RTI activists - Jan 14, 2010
- Did not suppress Madras High Court chief's report: Balakrishnan (Lead) - Dec 15, 2010
- CIC wants Chawla view on disclosing Gopalaswami's letter - Nov 11, 2009
- Court stays order to provide Tehelka report to Fernandes - Jul 22, 2011
- CIC asks government to give Phukan report to Fernandes - Nov 25, 2009
- Chronology of judges' assets case - Jan 12, 2010
- RTI activist told not to reveal information on Padma awards - Apr 08, 2010
- 'Reveal file notings on Kalam's letter on Padma awards' - Nov 11, 2009
- Habibullah stays as CIC, tells Omar can't take RTI post - Feb 15, 2010
Tags: activist, agrawal, apex, apex court, appellate authority, chandra, chief justice of india, court judge, disclosure of information, exalted status, habibullah, implication, information commission, information commissioner, judicial decisions, k g balakrishnan, madras high court, New Delhi, stature, union minister