CBI pulled up for closing case, without petitioner’s nod (Lead)
January 18th, 2010 - 8:22 pm ICT by IANS ( Leave a comment )New Delhi, Jan 18 (IANS) A city court Monday pulled up the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for not issuing a notice to the complainant before filing the closure report in a case of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
“CBI, a premier investigating agency, is not exempted from following the proper channel. It is the legal duty of the CBI to summon the complainant whenever closure report is filed in any case,” Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Lokesh Kumar said.
The court issued a notice to Harbinder Kaur, who lost her doctor-husband Iqbal Singh Chaddha in the riots sparked by the assassination of the then prime minister Indira Gandhi, to appear before the court Feb 23.
The court asked Kaur if she still wanted to pursue the case. According to court procedures, the complainant is asked this question before a case is closed.
Last week, the CBI filed two charge sheets in two riot cases of Delhi Cantonment and Sultanpuri areas against Congress leader Sajjan Kumar and others. They were charged with murder, rioting, destruction of evidence and criminal conspiracy.
The CBI, which probed the cases, also sought prosecution of Sajjan Kumar, a former MP from Outer Delhi, for allegedly making provocative speeches during the riots. He has been charged under section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code (promoting enmity between classes).
The agency had also filed a closure report pertaining to the death of Chaddha in the riots in Mangolpuri area, saying the complainant could not give any information as to where, when and who killed her husband and burnt his body.
The CBI said that several witnesses of the killing had died, while several others had shifted residence and were not traceable.
Meanwhile, the court has put the other two charge sheets - filed in the Sultanpuri and Delhi Cantonment cases - for further consideration Feb 1.
As the proceedings were on in the Karkardooma court, around 250 Sikhs staged a protest outside, torching an effigy of Sajjan Kumar. The police used water cannons to disperse the crowd.
“Ours was a peaceful protest. We don’t want to take law into our hands but want the guilty to be punished. It’s been 25 years since the guilty are on the run,” said Baljeet Kaur, president of voluntary group ‘Sikhs For Justice’.
All India Sikh Students Federation representative Karnail Singh said: “We have not broken any law. Water cannons should not be used against us in this chilling winter. They just want to harass us.”
- Complainant in 1984 riots asked if she wants to pursue case - Jan 18, 2010
- CBI chargesheets Sajjan Kumar in 1984 riots cases (Lead) - Jan 13, 2010
- High court adjourns hearing on Sajjan Kumar's plea - Sep 16, 2010
- Sajjan Kumar charged with inciting 1984 rioters (Roundup) - Jan 13, 2010
- Fresh warrant against Sajjan Kumar for 1984 riots (Lead) - Feb 23, 2010
- Apex court stays anti-Sikh riots case against Sajjan - Aug 13, 2010
- 1984 riots: Murder charge against Sajjan Kumar (Second Lead) - Jul 07, 2010
- No relief to Sajjan Kumar from high court (Lead) - Aug 20, 2010
- 1984 riots accused contests CBI court's jurisdiction - Mar 30, 2010
- CBI gets nod to prosecute Sajjan Kumar (Second Lead) - Dec 31, 2009
- 1984 riots: Murder charge framed against Sajjan Kumar (Lead) - Jul 07, 2010
- Delhi Court to hear chargesheets against Sajjan Kumar - Jan 18, 2010
- CBI opposes Sajjan Kumar's bail plea in 1984 riot cases - Feb 15, 2010
- Sajjan Kumar gets notice in 1984 anti-Sikh riots cases (Lead) - Feb 01, 2010
- 1984 riots: No anticipatory bail for Sajjan Kumar (Lead) - Feb 15, 2010
Tags: anti sikh riots, cbi, central bureau of investigation, charge sheets, closure report, complainant, congress leader, criminal conspiracy, delhi cantonment, enmity, indian penal code, indira gandhi, investigating agency, kaur, magistrate, outer delhi, petitioner, prime minister indira, sajjan kumar, sikhs