Canal water allocation not in judicial domain: Apex court
July 25th, 2011 - 11:56 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, July 25 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday said the decision on releasing water from rivers’ canals is in the domain of the government and the judiciary has no role to play in it.
The court have the ruling while dismissing an application filed by an organisation from Gujarat’s Kutch region, which sought more water for canals in the area.
“We are of the opinion that the prayer for allocation of adequate water in Kutch district is not one which can be a matter of judicial review. It is for the executive authorities to look into this matter,” said the apex court bench of Justice Markandey Katju and Justice C.K. Prasad.
The court said this while dismissing an application by Kachchh Jal Sankat Nivaran Samiti challenging a Gujarat High Court decision dismissing their plea for direction to the state government to release more water to canals running through the Kutch region, which constitutes one-fourth of the state’s area.
The high court verdict was delivered Oct 4, 2005.
The apex court referred to the high court verdict which said that there were no judicially manageable standards for the adjudication of the allocation of water in favour of any region within the state.
The court said the government was the best judge to decide how much water should be released from the Narmada canal to Kutch and how much water should be left for other regions.
“All these decisions require delicate balancing and consideration of complex social and economical factors which cannot be brought under judicial scrutiny,” said the court.
- Foundation laid for Narmada canal project in Kutch - Apr 09, 2011
- Apex court rejects woman's alimony claim - Oct 21, 2010
- Katju to head Press Council - Oct 05, 2011
- SC split verdict on Madani's bail plea in Bangalore blast case - May 04, 2011
- Debate on euthanasia a must: Moily - Mar 07, 2011
- Package for canal-hit and dam displaced not same, rules court - Aug 02, 2011
- Apex court to hear Allahabad High Court's plea Friday - Dec 09, 2010
- Apex court rejects plea to review verdict on 'keep' - Mar 16, 2011
- Supreme Court warns police against custodial violence - Mar 29, 2011
- Hang bride burners: Supreme Court, - Oct 09, 2010
- Test could have confirmed child's paternity, court tells killer father - Oct 07, 2010
- Apex court grants bail to Chisti, appreciates India-Pakistan bonhomie (Lead) - Apr 09, 2012
- States told to remove encroachment from village public land - Jan 31, 2011
- Relief for canal-affected and dam-displaced not same: Apex court (Lead) - Aug 02, 2011
- Apex court refuses to expunge 'rotten' remark - Dec 10, 2010
Tags: adequate water, adjudication, apex, apex court, canal water, canals, court bench, court decision, court verdict, economical factors, executive authorities, gujarat high court, jal, judicial review, judicial scrutiny, judiciary, kachchh, kutch region, state government, water allocation