Army told to reconvene court of inquiry on Purohit
March 9th, 2011 - 5:59 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, March 9 (IANS) In a major setback to the army’s efforts to dismiss Malegaon terror attack accused Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit, the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) Wednesday asked for the court of inquiry (COI) to be reconvened as it suffered “from the vice of irregularity”.
Issuing orders on a plea by Purohit, an AFT bench headed by Justice S.S. Kulshreshtha said the army should hold the court of inquiry once again from the stage when it recorded statements of witnesses in the absence of the accused officer.
“The court of inquiry suffers from the vice of irregularity. It would be just and proper to direct the army to further convene the COI from the stage when the statements of the witnesses were recorded on Sep 1, 2010, in absence of Purohit,” the AFT said in its orders.
Justice Kulshreshtha observed that certain witnesses were examined by the army in the absence of Purohit, who had “no opportunity to cross examine them” and that this violated the army’s Rule 180.
Army Rule 180 stipulates that the military personnel, whose reputations is being questioned by the COI, has to be present when witness statements are being recorded and he or she should be given an opportunity to cross examine them.
Purohit, 39, had said in his plea: “The COI makes an investigation into the criminal offence punishable with jail sentence. Therefore, the mandatory character of Rule 180 cannot be ignored while holding a court martial.”
Purohit, who has been dismissed from service, was arrested in November 2008 in connection with the September 2008 Malegaon blast. The COI had convened on April 7, 2009 and concluded its hearings on Sep 1, 2010 after it recorded the depositions of witnesses.
“From the perusal of the entire material on record, it appears that certain witnesses were examined on Sep 1, 2010, wherein Purohit had no opportunity to cross examine them,” the bench said.
Six people were killed and many more injured when a powerful bomb ripped through Maharashtra’s Malegaon town on Sep 29, 2008.
- Former Lt Gen Avadesh Prakash gets temporary relief - Mar 16, 2010
- Court sets aside report against Ramjas College vice-principal (Lead) - May 22, 2012
- Malegaon blast: Purohit's custodial interrogation put off - Mar 21, 2012
- Sukna land scam: Ex-Lt. Gen.Rath to face court martial from Aug.30 - Aug 20, 2010
- Sukna scam: Retired general's plea dismissed - Apr 09, 2010
- Malegaon blast: Army officer denied bail by apex court (Lead) - Oct 04, 2010
- Lieutenant General Rath withdraws petition from the Armed Forces Tribunal - Feb 25, 2010
- Malegaon blast: NIA to interrogate accused army officer - Jul 19, 2011
- Government objects in court to RSS chief's Malegaon remarks - Mar 01, 2012
- Apex court notice to Chhattisgarh on judges' appointment (Lead) - Jan 02, 2012
- Malegaon blast: Apex court denies bail to ex-armyman - Oct 04, 2010
- Sukna land scam: Tainted officer gets another chance (Lead) - Feb 22, 2010
- Court seeks CBI's reply on Sajjan Kumar's plea - May 15, 2012
- Apex court dismisses Sadhvi Pragya's bail plea (Lead) - Sep 23, 2011
- Apex court notice on plea to summon Modi before riots panel - Mar 19, 2012
Tags: armed forces, army rule, bench, criminal offence, depositions, irregularity, jail sentence, lt, major setback, military personnel, New Delhi, perusal, plea, prasad, purohit, reputations, shrikant, terror attack, tribunal, witness statements