Apex court reserves ruling on RTI plea on judges’ posting
November 18th, 2010 - 7:29 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Nov 18 (IANS) The Supreme Court Thursday reserved the verdict on its own petition challenging the Central Information Commission’s (CIC) order directing the chief justice of India to give details on the appointment of three apex court judges.
While reserving the order, the apex court bench of Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S. Nijjar said that it would also consider a suggestion by Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati that the entire matter be referred to the constitution bench.
The court was hearing a petition by the central public information officer of the apex court challenging the CIC order which directed the then chief justice K.G. Balakrishnan to make public details about the appointment of the three judges.
The CIC passed its order last year on an application by activist S.C. Aggrawal under the right to information (RTI) law seeking details on the appointment Justice H.L. Dattu, Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice R.M. Lodha.
All the three judges were elevated to the apex court superseding their seniors.
Arguing that the matter be referred to the constitution bench, Vahanvati told the court that the appointment of judges involved the substantial question of law and the independence of judiciary.
Appearing for Aggarwal, senior counsel Prashant Bhushan said: “There was a growing disquiet over the manner in which judicial appointments are being made under the existing system”.
Denial of information on the appointment of judges was giving rise to misgivings in the minds of the people, the senior counsel said.
He said the appointment process could not be kept shrouded in secrecy.
He said people want to “see and know” how transparent was the process of appointment of judges in higher judiciary.
- Demand for details on judges goes to constitutional bench - Nov 26, 2010
- Black money case: Apex court reserves verdict (Lead) - Sep 01, 2011
- Supreme Court reserves verdict on Mulayam's plea - Feb 17, 2011
- Apex court to hear Bhushan's plea on contempt of court - Nov 16, 2011
- Revisit system of judges' appointment, Supreme Court urged - Apr 04, 2011
- CJI to decide bench for hearing death row convict's plea - Feb 09, 2012
- New bench of apex court to hear 2G review plea - Mar 03, 2012
- Apex court shelves CIC order on judicial appointment - Dec 04, 2009
- Impeachment debate: Lawyers say judges' criticism fair - Aug 21, 2011
- Supreme Court postpones verdict on Bhopal gas tragedy petition - Apr 28, 2011
- Government reluctant on U. Lalit's appointment in 2G case (Lead) - Apr 05, 2011
- Apex court spared neither holy cows, nor corrupt in 2011 (2011 in Retrospect) - Dec 28, 2011
- Courts used for settling political scores, apex court told - Feb 08, 2011
- Larger bench may take up Punjab Sikhs' minority status case - Nov 18, 2010
- Don't corrode judiciary, says apex court - Dec 08, 2011
Tags: apex court, appointment of judges, chief justice of india, cic, constitution bench, court bench, court judges, court reserves, disquiet, existing system, ganguly, information commission, judicial appointments, misgivings, nijjar, public details, public information officer, question of law, senior counsel, substantial question