Apex court laments inaction against child marriagesFebruary 8th, 2011 - 11:13 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Feb 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday lamented that thousands of marriages involving minor girls were being solemnised in the country, particularly in Rajasthan, and yet no action was being taken by those in authority.”Hundreds of marriages take place. Not in hundreds but in thousands. Everyone knows it. Dates of marriages are fixed. Wedding cards are printed and distributed. Advertisements are placed in newspapers. It is in everyone’s knowledge. Yet no action is taken,” said the apex court bench of Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice A.K. Ganguly.
The court’s observation came on a petition by the National Commission for Women (NCW).
The NCW has challenged a Delhi High Court verdict that held that if woman had not attained the age of 18 years and man had not turned 21, their marriage could not be held to be void if the girl makes a statement before the court that she married the man voluntarily. The high court judgment was delivered Aug 11, 2010.
The central government told the court that marriage between the age group of 16-18 should be treated as “void” if either of the couple decides to walk out.
Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told the court that this was the only way to deal with the marriages between lovers who runaway from their homes before entering into the wedlock.
In these cases, the woman at the age of 16 is treated as having attained the age of consent for sexual relationship but is still not an adult (aged 18) to give her consent for marriage.
The court was told that due to this irreconcilable situation, the man who marries a woman of 16 years runs the risk of being charged for kidnapping and rape.
The court was also told that government had yet to take a view on the recommendation of the law commission in this regard. However, it left it for the court to take a final decision.
The NCW has challenged the high court judgment as it legalises the marriage of minor girls, which can have a consequential affect on their health and security in the long run.
It contended that such a situation has arisen because of the different definition of minor under different laws.
The court was told that an age of 16 years was good enough to give consent for sex, 18 years was the age for exercising the right to vote and 21 years was the age for marriage for men
Justice Ganguly observed that exercising the right to vote involved greater maturity and responsibility then any other thing.
The court observed: “It has to be a uniform age. It cannot be different for different situations.”
Appearing for the NCW, counsel Aparna Bhat expressed some reservation on the suggestions made by Jaising on behalf of the government.
The court adjourned hearing and listed the case for March 15 for further hearing.
- Replacing rape with sexual assault: activists welcome move (Lead) - Jul 20, 2012
- Court order promotes 'balika vadhus' among Muslims: Thackeray - Jun 08, 2012
- New law to end ambiguity on marriageable age - Jun 13, 2010
- Court acquits man charged with kidnapping minor - May 11, 2012
- Centre opposes plea for stay on Italian Marines' trial - Aug 08, 2012
- Minor girl in Odisha protests against forced marriage - Jul 24, 2012
- Indian Muslims split over wedding age ruling - Jun 08, 2012
- Apex court slams misuse of leniency for minor accused - Apr 14, 2012
- Is a minor's marriage with consent legal? - Jun 11, 2010
- Marriages can be ended before cooling period: Apex court - Aug 25, 2012
- HIV-positive rapist faces trial for attempt to murder - Jun 11, 2012
- Apex court reserves verdict on anti-gay sex petitions (Lead) - Mar 27, 2012
- Minor resists marriage, gets father arrested in Odisha - Jul 26, 2012
- Apex court raps government for flip-flop on homosexuality (Lead) - Feb 28, 2012
- Apex court seeks attorney general's assistance in gay law case - Mar 21, 2012
Tags: age of consent, apex, apex court, bhandari, central government, child marriages, court bench, court judgment, court verdict, delhi high court, final decision, ganguly, inaction, indira, minor girls, rajasthan, sexual relationship, solicitor general, wedding cards, wedlock