Apex court judge criticised for listing daughters as ‘liability’
December 29th, 2010 - 9:16 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Dec 29 (IANS) Supreme Court judge Gyan Sudha Misra has come under criticism from the legal fraternity for declaring the future marriages of her two daughters as “liability” with a senior counsel calling it as manifestation of a “retrograde mindset”.
Misra, the only women judge in the Supreme Court at present, shocked everyone by declaring “two daughters to be married” against the liabilities column on the Supreme Court’s official website listing the assets of sitting judges.
Most of the counsels contacted by IANS expressed their shock but understandably refused to be named.
One lawyer refused to comment while another tried to evade a response by saying he hadn’t read the newspapers.
Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan described the act as manifestation of a “retrograde mindset”.
“It shows very backward and retrograde mindset and it is not expected from a judge of Supreme Court,” Bhushan told IANS.
He said daughters should be “regarded as an asset and not a liability”.
Misra had also included her standing as “guarantor for education loan of my daughter” as a “liability”.
Bhushan said declaring education loan as a liability was understandable but not daughters’ marriage.
However, senior counsel Pinki Anand said that what Misra said was an indication of the expense she would incur on the marriages of her daughters.
“As far as I understand, it is an expression of investments one has in mind for the weddings of daughters. After all, wedding, be it of a son or a daughter, involves expenses,” Anand said.
“After all, whenever we plan investments, we take into account the education, the career settlements and the marriages of children,” Anand added.
But Anand agreed that listing of these expenses under the liability head may not be strictly in accordance with the format of assets and liabilities disclosure by the judges of the apex court.
- Apex court orders funds for panel on sex workers (Lead) - Aug 02, 2011
- Remove Balakrishnan as NHRC chief: Prashant Bhushan - Dec 28, 2010
- Supreme Court to examine validity of n-damage act (Lead) - Mar 16, 2012
- Contempt of court: Bhushan told to work out solution - Jul 13, 2011
- Rajendra Sethia trial to run on daily basis, rules apex court - May 18, 2012
- Court reserves order on strike by AIIMS doctors - Jan 19, 2011
- Aarushi case: Arguments on charges inconclusive (Lead) - May 22, 2012
- Lucknow jail death: Apex court favours independent probe (Lead) - Jul 08, 2011
- Lokpal Bill will be drafted irrespective of Bhushans past: Lokayukta Hegde - Apr 20, 2011
- Parliament not to publish members' assets details online - May 08, 2011
- Breather for Kripashankar: Apex court stays attachment order (Lead) - Mar 13, 2012
- Supreme Court relief for Krishna (Lead) - Jan 27, 2012
- 'Educated girls entering flesh trade for money' (Lead) - Jan 27, 2012
- Supreme Court asks lawyer to file fresh apology - May 03, 2011
- Framing of charges underway in Aarushi case - May 22, 2012
Tags: apex, apex court, assets and liabilities, criticised, disclosure, education loan, guarantor, gyan, investments, lawyer, legal fraternity, manifestation, mindset, misra, New Delhi, senior counsel, shock, sudha, supreme court judge, two daughters