Apex court dismisses plea against tainted MPsAugust 12th, 2011 - 10:37 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Aug 12 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday dismissed a petition seeking direction to the government to recommend to the president to suspend 154 members of Lok Sabha facing criminal charges or against whom FIRs have been lodged.
The apex court bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S.Panicker Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar told the PIL petitioner Manohar Lal Sharma that the court had no powers to issue such directions to the Union of India.
Even as PIL petitioner pressed for the direction, the Chief Justice Kapadia said, “You are asking that Union of India should invite (action) by the President on our direction.”
Chief Justice Kapadia went to say “there is separation of power (under the constitution). We have no authority to pass such a direction.”
When PIL petitioner Sharma asked then who will refer the question to the President, the court dismissed the petition saying , “We can’t direct. We don’t have the authority.”
The advocate petitioner Sharma said that after the enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) in 1988, all those who are drawing salaries from the public exchequer were defined as public servants.
He said that by that measure all the members of parliament, state legislatures, local bodies like municipal corporation and gram panchayats came in the ambit of PCA.
The petitioner advocate said that out of 154 MPs, 72 are facing serious charges. He told the court that BJP was on the top of the list with its 42 MPs facing criminal charges and Congress having just one short at 41 facing the criminal charges.
The petition said that country’s top most tax evader Hasan Ali too had recently disclosed the names of several ministers and MPs involved with him in hawala transactions.
The court was told that there was no law that prohibited these people from contesting elections. As a consequence, with every election the representative bodies were becoming “dens of criminals and democracy was in danger”.
The petitioner said that the rule of suspension under the PCA should apply to all across the board including the elected representatives.
- SC trashes plea against Pranab, warns petitioner (Second Lead) - Jul 06, 2012
- Plea against legislator's 'kangaroo court' dismissed (Lead) - Aug 01, 2011
- Plea on right to property dismissed - Oct 18, 2010
- Apex court declines to stay Lokpal Bill notification - Apr 29, 2011
- Supreme Court dismisses petition in Vodafone case - Mar 02, 2012
- Plea against legislator's 'kangaroo court' dismissed - Aug 01, 2011
- Apex court trashes PIL against Pranab, warns petitioner (Lead) - Jul 06, 2012
- Apex court dismisses lawyer's petition in Vodafone case (Lead) - Mar 02, 2012
- Supreme Court to decide CVC's fate Thursday - Mar 02, 2011
- Supreme Court refuses to take up PIL on Lokpal Bill panel - Apr 29, 2011
- Apex court seeks government answer on Thomas posting as CVC (Second Lead) - Dec 06, 2010
- Courts can't decide poll dates: Supreme Court (Lead) - Jan 13, 2012
- Plea questioning reliability of voting machines dismissed - Oct 19, 2010
- Supreme Court rejects plea on army chief's age (Lead) - Jan 20, 2012
- Court dismisses plea against Mukherjee - Jun 29, 2012
Tags: ambit, apex court, chief justice, court bench, criminal charges, gram panchayats, hasan ali, kapadia, Lok Sabha, members of parliament, panicker, pca, petitioner, prevention of corruption act, public servants, radhakrishnan, representative bodies, separation of power, state legislatures, tax evader