Advocate denies handing over report on Punjab judiciary to Moily
June 8th, 2009 - 7:17 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, June 8 (IANS) Senior Supreme Court advocate K.T.S Tulsi Monday denied handing over a Punjab vigilance bureau report on alleged corruption in the state’s higher judiciary to Union Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily and recommending that he take up the matter with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
“I did meet the minister but the meeting had nothing to do with the Punjab vigilance bureau report,” said Tulsi.
“I neither handed him any report nor recommended to him to take up the matter with the prime minister,” he said.
“Do I have any locus standi in a matter that involves the state and the central governments and the Chief Justice of India? I had met the law minister but it was for a private purpose,” Tulsi added.
Since the last week the media has been agog about a Punjab Vigilance Bureau report based on telephone surveillance of suspected militants that alleged a murky nexus between touts and judges.
As per the report, the bureau had recorded telephonic conversation among militants talking of judges who would fix the outcome of court verdicts for money.
The report said the Punjab government had forwarded the report to the Prime Minister’s Office and to the law ministry. It also said the union government was mulling action on the report.
Law Minister Moily on Friday denied “receiving any report from any quarter, including the PMO or the state government”.
Speaking to reporters after release of a book “Unleashing India”, authored by him, Moily had said, “I have not received any report from any quarter whatsoever on the Punjab judiciary.”
Advocate Tulsi, meanwhile, also denied that a three-member judicial panel, constituted by the Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan, had recommended impeachment of Justice Nirmal Yadav of the Punjab and Haryana High Court for allegedly being the intended beneficiary of a hefty sum of cash that was mistakenly delivered at the door of another woman judge Nimaljit Kaur last year.
“This is also contrary to records,” said Tulsi, who had acted as legal counsel to one of the judges involved in the scam.
- Raja phone call case: 'I don't want to play a blame game', says Justice Reghupathi - Dec 18, 2010
- High court dismisses ex-judge's plea against prosecution - Nov 14, 2011
- Raja phone call case: 'It is a judicial matter', says Moily - Dec 14, 2010
- Thomas quits after apex court rap, government defends PM - Mar 03, 2011
- Jethmalani pleads for bail for Amit Shah - Oct 22, 2010
- Judicial custody for five co-accused in 2G telecom spectrum case - Apr 20, 2011
- Ex-judge asked me not to complain against Balakrishnan: Iyer - Jan 03, 2011
- Did not suppress Madras High Court chief's report: Balakrishnan (Lead) - Dec 15, 2010
- Amit Shah's bail hearing adjourned to Wednesday - Oct 26, 2010
- CBI moves petition before Supreme Court against Amit Shah - Oct 30, 2010
- Gujarat advocates to file writ on delay in judges' appointments - Sep 14, 2010
- Interfering minister's name was not shared: Balakrishnan (Lead) - Dec 08, 2010
- Sohrabuddin case: Amit Shah heads for Mumbai on Supreme Court's orders - Oct 31, 2010
- Sohrabuddin killing accused cop shifted out of jail - Sep 09, 2010
- Evidence linking me to Sohrabuddin killing fake: Amit Shah (Lead) - Jul 26, 2011
Tags: alleged corruption, central governments, chief justice of india, hefty sum, judicial panel, k g balakrishnan, law ministry, locus standi, manmohan singh, nirmal, prime minister manmohan, prime minister manmohan singh, private purpose, punjab and haryana high court, punjab government, tulsi, union government, union law minister, veerappa, woman judge