2G: Supreme Court issues notice on review petition
April 13th, 2012 - 6:16 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, April 13 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday issued notice on the government’s plea seeking a review of its verdict cancelling 122 2G licenses and holding that an auction was the only route for disposing of natural resources.
The apex court, by its Feb 2 verdict, had also held that the policy of allocating 2G licenses on a first-come-first-served basis was flawed.
An apex court bench of Justice G. S. Singhvi and Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan issued notice when it took up government petition seeking review of the 2G verdict in the open court.
When Additional Solicitor General Indra Jaisingh wanted to know the scope of applicabilty of 2G verdict, the court said that these were just apprehensions.
- 2G: Supreme Court issues notice on review petition (Lead) - Apr 13, 2012
- 2G: Apex court allows review plea withdrawal (Second Lead) - May 10, 2012
- More time sought for auction of spectrum - Aug 09, 2012
- 2G: Apex court examines review petitions - Apr 03, 2012
- Government given 3 more months to auction 2G licenses - Apr 24, 2012
- 2G: Apex court to hear government's plea April 13 - Apr 05, 2012
- 2G: Apex court examines review petitions (Lead) - Apr 03, 2012
- 2G case: Apex court allows review petition withdrawal (Lead) - May 10, 2012
- Government given 3 more months to auction 2G licenses (Lead) - Apr 24, 2012
- 2G case: Government petition seeks court verdict review - Mar 02, 2012
- Supreme Court extends 2G auction deadline to Jan 11 (Lead) - Aug 27, 2012
- 2G: SC wants auction undertaking for extending deadline - Aug 24, 2012
- Apex court receives presidential reference on 2G (Lead) - Apr 12, 2012
- Don't touch policy-making power, Chhattisgarh tells SC - Aug 01, 2012
- SC to hear plea for more time for 2G licence auction - Aug 21, 2012
Tags: 2g, apex, apex court, apprehensions, auction, court bench, feb 2, first come first served basis, government petition, indra, natural resources, New Delhi, plea, s radhakrishnan, scope, solicitor general, supreme court issues