US federal judge says cheerleading is not a sportJuly 22nd, 2010 - 6:54 pm ICT by ANI
New York, July 22 (ANI): A federal judge in Connecticut has ruled that competitive cheerleading is not a sport and insisted that Quinnipiac University had failed to provide equal opportunities for its female athletes, as it tried to cut women’s volleyball and offer competitive cheerleading instead.
According to the Daily News, Quinnipiac argued that it was being forced to eliminate volleyball for budgetary reasons and that competitive cheerleading would offer an acceptable athletic alternative.
The women’s team, however, filed a suit claiming the school was shutting down their sport while funneling resources unfairly into male athletics.
In a 95-page decision released Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill ordered Quinnipiac to come up with a solution in the next 60 days to keep the volleyball team in place and find a way to remain in compliance with Title IX, the 1972 federal law that requires male and female athletes to be given equal opportunities.
“The University’s competitive cheerleading team does not qualify as a varsity sport for the purposes of Title IX and, therefore, its members may not be counted as athletic participants under the statute,” Underhill wrote.
Under Title IX, an activity can be considered a sport if it meets certain criteria, namely that it has coaches, practices, competitions during a defined season, a governing organization, and competition as its primary goal and not just the support of other athletic teams, the report said.
Over the course of the case, Underhill found that the school had failed in a larger way, by not offering female student athletes a proportionate amount of athletic opportunities in relation to how many women are enrolled at the school.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which represented the volleyball team in the lawsuit, released a statement following the decision saying, “Today’s ruling directs Quinnipiac University to stop playing games with the important principle of equal opportunity for women.” (ANI)
- Cheerleading Not A Sport? Debate Lands In Court - Jun 23, 2010
- No takers for women managers in athletics - Feb 10, 2011
- Latest craze at the Games: Therapeutic tape (Olympic diary) - Aug 05, 2012
- Sahara India to sponsor Indian volleyball - Apr 16, 2012
- Indian basketball teams announced for Asian Beach Games - Jun 15, 2012
- Goan leader plans to introduce cheerleading to football - Feb 11, 2011
- Mumbai sports scribes sweep team titles at national meet - Mar 24, 2012
- US sponsors India-Pakistan girls soccer exchange - Sep 10, 2012
- Three cheers for Indian culture, say IPL's foreign cheerleaders - Apr 12, 2012
- China harvests in 'backyard' sports but challenges loom ahead of Olympics - Dec 27, 2011
- China plays down expectations for dominance at Olympics - Jul 26, 2012
- Asiad, CWG gold winner Ashwini joins dope-tainted stars (Roundup) - Jul 04, 2011
- US fighting childhood obesity with sports - May 15, 2012
- Saudi Arabia threatens to quit Olympics - Jul 27, 2012
- Bushcrickets have 'the largest testicles as per body weight' - Nov 10, 2010
Tags: aclu, american civil liberties, american civil liberties union, athletic opportunities, budgetary reasons, cheerleading is not a sport, cheerleading team, civil liberties union, competitive cheerleading, equal opportunities, federal judge, female athletes, female student athletes, page decision, principl, quinnipiac university, title ix, underhill, varsity sport, volleyball team