Time to end lethal lottery of Indias death penalty system: AmnestyMay 2nd, 2008 - 4:25 pm ICT by admin
New Delhi, May 2 (ANI): Indias death penalty system is riddled with fatal flaws and the only remedy is to abolish the practice completely, the Indian branch of the human rights watchdog, Amnesty International, has said.
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties, which is based in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, and also had a hand in preparing the report, endorsed this view.
The report reveals that at least 140 people have been sentenced to death in 2006 and 2007, and there are officially 273 persons on death row as on December 31, 2005.
Describing the fate of these death row prisoners as a lottery, the report claimed that the Indian judicial system has failed to meet standards of international law and internationally acceptable norms for applying the death penalty.
This is the first comprehensive analysis of around 700 Supreme Court judgments on death penalty cases over 50 years, the authors of the report said.
Amnesty International India and the Peoples Union for Civil Liberties study titled Lethal Lottery: The Death Penalty in India, A study of Supreme Court judgments in death penalty cases 1950-2006, is the first to examine the essential unfairness of the death penalty system in India by analyzing evidence found in Supreme Court judgments of abuse of law and procedure and of arbitrariness and inconsistency in the investigation, trial, sentencing and appeal stages in capital cases.
The study of the courts highlights some of the main failings as:
Errors in consideration of evidence - most death sentences handed down in India are based on circumstantial evidence alone. In a 1994 Supreme Court appeal, the Court noted sarcastically that the main witness’s memory constantly improved. His testimony at the trial three years after the incident was observed to be far more detailed than his confessional statement recorded a few days after.
Inadequate legal representation - concerns included lawyers ignoring key facts of mental incompetence, omitting to provide any arguments on sentencing, or failing to dispute claims that the accused was under 18 years of age at the time of the crime despite evidence to the contrary.
Anti-terrorist legislation - concerns include the broad definition of terrorist acts, insufficient safeguards on arrest, and provisions allowing for confessions made to police to be admissible as evidence.
Arbitrariness in sentencing - in the same month, different benches of the Supreme Court have treated similar cases differently, with mitigating factors taken into account or disregarded arbitrarily.
It demonstrates that the administration of the death penalty in India has not been in the rarest of rare cases as claimed in the country. On the contrary, there is ample evidence to show that the death penalty has been an arbitrary, imprecise and abusive means of dealing with defendants.
Dr V Suresh, the President of the PUCL, said: While the death penalty continues to be used in India, there remains a danger that it will be used disproportionately against ethnic minorities, the poor or other disadvantaged groups. There is only one way to ensure such inequalities in the administration of justice do not occur: the complete abolition of the death penalty.
Welcoming the current hiatus of executions in the country and the relative lack of executions in the last decade (one in 2004), Amnesty International said it showed that the people of India are willing to live without the death penalty.
India stands at a crossroads. It can choose to join the global trend towards a moratorium on the death penalty, as adopted by the UN General Assembly last year. It will also then join 27 countries in the Asia Pacific region which have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice. Or it can continue to hang death row inmates, when the judicial system that puts them there has been shown by this extensive research to be unfair, said Mukul Sharma, Amnesty International-India Director.
A total of 135 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice, having realized executions are unacceptable. In 2007, only 24 countries carried out executions (China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the USA were the main five perpetrators, accounting for 88 per cent of all known executions). (ANI)
Tags: amnesty international, arbitrariness, circumstantial evidence, civil liberties, confessional statement, death penalty cases, death penalty system, death row prisoners, death sentences, fatal flaws, human rights watchdog, inconsistency, legal representation, lethal lottery, puducherry, representation concerns, s union, supreme court appeal, supreme court judgments, unfairness