Offering unselfish people incentives could backfire for companiesJune 20th, 2008 - 4:09 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, June 20 (ANI): Individuals often sacrifice their personal self interest for the common good and expecting them to behave selfishly by giving incentives can lead to bad policy, a new research has warned.
Professor Sam Bowles, from the Santa Fe Institute, in New Mexico, said incentives offered on the basis of “greed is good” could backfire for companies.
He argues today in the journal Science that economics will get it wrong, sometimes badly so. He points to new experimental evidence that people often act against their own self-interest in favour of the common good, and they do so in predictable, understandable ways.
Poorly-designed economic institutions fail to take advantage of intrinsic moral behavior and often undermine it.
Among the examples he cites are six day care centres, which imposed a fine on parents who picked their children up late. The effect? Lateness doubled, and it stayed high even when the fine was removed.
Another example is a study this year, which showed that women donated blood less frequently when they were paid for it than when it was an act of charity.
These examples show that economists ignore human altruism at their peril. Standard economic theory assumes that incentives that appeal to self-interest won’t affect any natural altruism that may exist, but that assumption is clearly wrong.
Bowles discusses the research to date that helps to explain when and why that assumption breaks down.
As the world becomes more interconnected and the resulting challenges to humanity increase, learning to harness these altruistic impulses becomes even more important, Bowles says. (ANI)
- Nice guys actually get the girl in the end - Oct 14, 2010
- Altruism varies under different conditions - May 01, 2012
- Corporate logos can both help and harm - May 17, 2011
- How we become altruistic - Sep 22, 2010
- Grey matter size linked to altruism, says study - Jul 12, 2012
- 'Selfless' fairy wrens are in fact carefully calculating accountants - Mar 19, 2011
- War, migration helped in evolution of human social behaviour - Jun 05, 2009
- CA chief defends axed Ponting - Feb 26, 2012
- Chimps can match humans in kindness - Aug 10, 2011
- Chimps happy to help - but only when said please to! - Oct 14, 2009
- How you think about your personal goals can affect your relationships - Nov 17, 2010
- Women go for nice guys - in the end - Feb 11, 2010
- Workplace myths debunked: 9 things you should never assume at work - Jan 25, 2011
- Power, alcohol, anonymity make you drop guard - Jun 23, 2011
- When status on the mind, people forgo luxury for green products - Mar 18, 2010
Tags: altruism, assumption, charity, day care centres, economic institutions, economic theory, economists, experimental evidence, favour, greed, impulses, incentives, journal science, moral behavior, new mexico, peril, professor sam, santa fe institute, self interest, theory assumes that