Distractions can make you susceptible to adsApril 22nd, 2008 - 12:31 pm ICT by admin
Washington, Apr 22 (ANI): Contrary to earlier studies, awesome advertisements do affect peoples attitude towards various brands, especially when they are distracted.
In the study, Bryan Gibson (Central Michigan University) showed undergraduate psychology students pairings of well-known cola brands with words and images.
Some had positive associations: a field of flowers, the word awesome, or a mother holding a child. Others had negative associations: people at a gravesite, the word terrifying, or a person in a contamination suit.
Participants were then distracted by an unrelated cognitive task memorizing an eight-digit number and offered a can of Coke or Pepsi to take home with them.
When distracted, those who were initially neutral towards both brands strongly tended to choose the brand that had been paired with positive images or words in the earlier task. Importantly, this happened even when the participant couldnt remember which brand had been paired with positive information, Gibson reports.
Those who had an established preference for one brand before the experiment, as established by a pre-test, were not affected by the inclusion of a distracting task while making their choices.
These results have implications regarding how consumer attitudes are formed, and how they are then applied in brand choice situations, Gibson said.
This suggests that implicit product attitudes may play a greater role in product choice when the consumer is distracted or making an impulse purchase, he added.
The study Can Evaluative Conditioning Change Attitudes toward Mature Brands: New Evidence from the Implicit Association Test is published in the Journal of Consumer Research. (ANI)
Tags: brand choice, bryan gibson, central michigan university, change attitudes, choice situations, cognitive task, consumer attitudes, contamination, digit number, distractions, field of flowers, implicit association test, impulse purchase, journal of consumer research, negative associations, new evidence, positive information, product choice, suit participants, undergraduate psychology students