Disallowed England goal reverberates around world
June 27th, 2010 - 11:38 pm ICT by IANSBloemfontein, June 27 (DPA) Frank Lampard’s first-half goal in Sunday’s 4-1 defeat to Germany, disallowed despite the ball bouncing about half a metre beyond the goal line, recalled Geoff Hurst’s famously controversial strike when the two nations met in the 1966 World Cup final.
In a strange twist, Hurst’s extra-time shot, which like Lampard’s effort came off the cross-bar, instead appeared not to have crossed the line. It was, however, adjudged a goal and it paved the way for England’s eventual 4-2 victory in Wembley.
Sunday’s incident in Bloemfontein came 44-years later and amid growing calls for the use of goal-line technology, including sensors, to assist referees and their assistants.
However, world football’s governing body FIFA has steadfastly refused to install the technology.
“We want to keep football as a game of the people with a human face, so we don’t want technology on the field of play because we want to maintain the spontaneity of football - played, administered and controlled by human beings,” FIFA President Sepp Blatter said before the start of the 2010 World Cup.
The world football supremo also said he believed the “tremendous preparations programmes” that World Cup referees had endured in the run-up to the tournament would avoid big errors being made.
But the Bloemfontein blunder by Uruguayan referee Jorge Larrionda and his assistants may now serve to hasten the introduction of sensors and other technology-assisted measures.
These could include instant video replays allowing referees to review incidents during the course of a match.
It may help that Larrionda’s mistake instantly reverberated around the world media.
“Scandal of the World Cup,” said Spanish sports daily Marca’s website - a sentiment echoed, using the same phrase, by Italian daily La Repubblica.
Even the Germans could do little but admit the Uruguayan match official’s mistake.
“The referee’s assistant should have seen it, it was clearly a goal,” said former team boss Franz Beckenbauer on German television.
In the World Cup final 44 years ago, Hurst scored for England with the ball bouncing out having come down on the goal line but Azerbaijani linesman Tofik Bakhramov said the ball crossed the line and awarded the goal.
Fortune favoured England in 1966 but this time the luck was against them with Der Spiegel saying: “Wembley is back, only the reverse of 1966.”
Despite his talk of accepting human imperfection, Blatter has not closed the door entirely to the use of technology.
“Technology on the field of play is put on ice. It is not out forever,” Blatter said.
- Germany demolish England 4-1 - Jun 27, 2010
- Germany crush England 4-1 for quarterfinal berth (Lead) - Jun 27, 2010
- Controversy in Germany's 4-1 demolition of England (Night Lead) - Jun 28, 2010
- FIFA mulling new goal-line technology, option of using extra officials - Oct 12, 2010
- Beckham pointed out my goal error: Ref - Sep 01, 2010
- FIFA: Mistakes by referees sparks debate - Jun 28, 2010
- Controversial 1966 World Cup goal not legitimate, admits England's hat-trick hero - Apr 01, 2010
- World Cup over for refs Rosetti, Larrionda - Jun 30, 2010
- This day in World Cup history -- June 11 - Jun 11, 2010
- Another "Wembley" goal highlights officiating problems at World Cup - Jun 27, 2010
- Sleeping giant India is slowly waking up: Blatter - Mar 09, 2012
- German parliament asked to have England goal recognised - Jun 30, 2010
- FIFA President finally apologises for Lampard 'goal', vows technology review - Jun 29, 2010
- Apologetic Blatter opens door for video technology - Jun 29, 2010
- England-Germany 'blunder referees' under South African police guard - Jun 28, 2010
Tags: bloemfontein, blunder, body fifa, cross bar, frank lampard, geoff hurst, goal line, governing body, human face, line technology, marca, replays, sepp blatter, spanish sports, spontaneity, strange twist, uruguayan referee jorge larrionda, wembley, world cup referees, world football