US turns up pressure on Pakistan to fight Taliban: NYT
December 8th, 2009 - 1:38 pm ICT by IANS
Washington, Dec 8 (IANS) The Obama administration has warned Pakistan that the US will use considerably more force on the Pakistani side of the border with Afghanistan if it does not act more aggressively against the Taliban, the New York Times reported Tuesday.
The blunt message was delivered in a tense encounter in Pakistan last month, before President Barack Obama announced his new war strategy, the influential US daily said citing unnamed American and Pakistani officials.
The message was delivered when Gen. James L. Jones, Obama’s national security adviser, and John O. Brennan, the White House counter-terrorism chief, met the heads of Pakistan’s military and its intelligence service, it said.
US officials cited by the Times said the message did not amount to an ultimatum, but rather was intended to prod a reluctant Pakistani military to go after Taliban insurgents in Pakistan who are directing attacks in Afghanistan.
For their part, the Pakistanis interpreted the message as a fairly bald warning that unless Pakistan moved quickly to act against two Taliban groups they have so far refused to attack, the US was prepared to take unilateral action.
Pakistanis believe the US may expand Predator drone attacks beyond the tribal areas and, if needed, to resume raids by Special Operations forces into the country against Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders.
The Times said a senior administration official, asked about the encounter, declined to go into details but added quickly, “I think they read our intentions accurately.”
The US daily cited a Pakistani official who has been briefed on the meetings as saying, “Jones’s message was if that Pakistani help wasn’t forthcoming, the United States would have to do it themselves.”
The recent security demands followed an offer of a broader strategic relationship and expanded intelligence sharing and non-military economic aid from the US.
Pakistan’s politically weakened president, Asif Ali Zardari, replied in writing to a two-page letter that General Jones delivered from Obama. But Zardari gave no indication of how Pakistan would respond to the incentives, which were linked to the demands for greatly stepped-up counter-terrorism actions, the daily said.
“We’ve offered them a strategic choice,” one administration official cited by the Times said, describing the private communications. “And we’ve heard back almost nothing.” Another administration official was quoted as saying, “Our patience is wearing thin.”
Related Stories
- U.S to Pakistan: `Take Care of Taliban,or We Will' - Dec 08, 2009
- US' "blunt" warning to Pak: Hit Taliban, Qaeda now, or we will be forced to do so - Dec 08, 2009
- US asks Pakistan to step up pressure on Taliban, Al Qaeda - Nov 16, 2009
- Obama's blunt warning forced Pak to go after Afghan Taliban - Feb 19, 2010
- US pressure led to Afghan Taliban insurgents' capture in Pakistan - Feb 19, 2010
- Drone attacks may be expanded in Pakistan: report - Dec 14, 2009
- Obama writes to Zardari to step up fight against Taliban and al-Qaeda - Nov 16, 2009
- Pakistan rebuffs US on Taliban crackdown: NYT - Dec 15, 2009
- Pakistan would not be 'prodded into any military action by outsiders': Qureshi - Nov 17, 2009
- Obama's blunt ultimatum to Pak to stop use of Lashkar-e-Taiba to 'pursue policy goals' - Nov 30, 2009
- Top Taliban commander captured in secret raid in Pakistan: NYT (Lead) - Feb 16, 2010
- US officials says top Taliban leader's capture a turning point - Feb 17, 2010
- Obama administration response to terror better than Bush administration: Biden - Feb 18, 2010
- Taliban aided by ISI widen Afghan attacks from base in Pakistan - Sep 24, 2009
- Pakistan offers to talk to Taliban to stem India's influence: NYT - Feb 10, 2010
- administration official
- asif ali
- barack obama
- counter terrorism
- economic aid
- intelligence service
- l jones
- national security adviser
- new war
- new york times
- nyt
- pakistani officials
- pakistanis
- predator drone
- security demands
- senior administration
- special operations forces
- tribal areas
- unilateral action
- war strategy
Posted in South Asia, |







