US to offer security pact to Pakistan: NYT
October 19th, 2010 - 11:45 am ICT by IANSBy Arun Kumar
Washington, Oct 19 (IANS) To repair ties damaged by the American military’s tough new stance in the region, the Obama administration will offer Pakistan a multi-year security pact complete with more reliable military aid, according to the New York Times.
The offer will be made to the Pakistani civilian and military leaders who arrive here this week for a strategic dialogue, the influential US daily said Tuesday.
Pakistan’s delegation will be led by its Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, but much of the attention will be on army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who is viewed by many as the most powerful man in Pakistan.
“Among the sweeteners on the table will be a multi-year security pact with Pakistan, complete with more reliable military aid - something the Pakistani military has long sought to complement the five-year, $7.5 billion package of non-military aid approved by Congress last year,” it said.
The administration will also discuss how to channel money to help Pakistan rebuild after its ruinous flood, it said.
But the American gestures come at a time of fraying patience on the part of the Obama administration, and they will carry a familiar warning, a senior American official was quoted as saying.
“If Pakistan does not intensify its efforts to crack down on militants hiding out in the tribal areas of North Waziristan, or if another terrorist plot against the United States were to emanate from Pakistani soil, the administration would find it hard to persuade Congress or the American public to keep supporting the country.”
The Pakistanis will come with a similarly mixed message. While Pakistan is grateful for the strong American support after the flood, Pakistani officials were quoted as saying, it remains frustrated by what it perceives as the slow pace of economic aid, the lack of access to American markets for Pakistani goods and the administration’s continued lack of sympathy for the country’s confrontation with India.
Another potential bone of contention is one of President Obama’s nuclear objectives: a global accord to end the production of new nuclear fuel. Pakistan has led the opposition to the accord. And without its agreement, the treaty would be basically useless, the Times said.
Qureshi blamed the US for the situation, saying Washington signed a civilian nuclear accord with India that discriminated against Pakistan. “You have disturbed the nuclear balance,” he said in a recent interview in New York, “and we have been forced to develop a new strategy.”
(Arun Kumar can be contacted at arun.kumar@ians.in)
- US set to give $2 bn military aid to Pakistan; but no n-deal - Oct 20, 2010
- Obama's India trip could tip power balance: Pakistan officials - Nov 06, 2010
- No intention to micromanage affairs, US lawmakers tell Pakistan - Oct 15, 2009
- Obama tags anti-terror terms to Pakistan aid package - Oct 16, 2009
- US asks Pakistan to step up terror fight; gives $2bn military aid (Lead) - Oct 22, 2010
- 9/11 Pakistani mastermind, 4 others sent for trial - Apr 05, 2012
- US experts suggest Pakistan policy relook - Dec 17, 2011
- Pak's insistence on India-type nuke deal may further strain testy ties with US - Oct 16, 2010
- Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, a headache for Obama: NYT - Feb 01, 2011
- Pakistan will not permit US micromanagement: Qureshi - Oct 07, 2009
- US multi-million dollar aid to Pak floundering: NYT - May 02, 2011
- US warns Pakistan to fight Taliban or lose funding: WSJ - Oct 22, 2010
- Pakistan's discomfort with India makes Afghan accord hard: US - May 02, 2012
- Aid freeze no big deal: US to Pakistan (Second Lead) - Dec 16, 2011
- Aid 'freeze' to Pakistan can bve waived: US - Dec 16, 2011
Tags: american gestures, american markets, army chief, arun kumar, ashfaq, kayani, military aid, mixed message, new york times, north waziristan, nyt, pakistani military, pakistani officials, parvez, powerful man, qureshi, security pact, shah mahmood, slow pace, terrorist plot