Reduction in cloud cover amplified dino-era global warming
April 11th, 2008 - 12:21 pm ICT by admin
- 
Washington, April 11 (ANI): A new study has suggested that during the age of dinosaurs about 100 million years ago, a warming spell caused cloud cover to drastically decrease, which helped to drive temperatures even higher.
According to a report in National Geographic News, average tropical temperatures during that era of the Cretaceous exceeded 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius), and the Polar regions were in the 50-degree-Fahrenheit (10-degree-Celsius) range.
In fact, atmospheric levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide were four times higher then than they are today, scientists estimated.
While high, though, that doesnt seem to be sufficient to get the type of warmth that the temperature data suggest, said Lee Kump, a geologist at Pennsylvania State University.
Now, Kump and colleague David Pollard have suggested that a reduction in cloud cover provided the temperature boost.
The researchers suggested that the reduction in Cretaceous cloud cover stemmed from a drop in cloud condensation nuclei, tiny particles around which water droplets form.
Today about half of such nuclei are human-produced pollutants. During the Cretaceous, the particles were derived mostly from plant material.
According to some climate models, warm global temperatures during the Cretaceous caused a decrease in plant growth. This was especially true in the oceans, because fewer nutrients were able to rise up to feed algae in the warm surface waters.
If the models are correct, this also reduced particulate matter in the atmosphere derived from plants and marine algae. Less particulate matter means fewer reflective cloud droplets.
So the clouds wouldnt be as bright, said Kump.
Less brightness means less of the suns energy is reflected back into space. The reflection is known as the albedo effect.
Starting with this premise, Kump and Pollard plugged various scenarios of reduced nuclei into a climate model to determine if they could account for all of the Cretaceous warming.
In addition to less brightness, they found the reduced particles led to bigger water droplets. Since droplets fall as rain when they reach a certain size, this also caused a reduction in cloud cover.
The scenario that best accounted for the warmth had cloud cover shrinking from 64 percent of the atmosphere to 55 percent.
The system is a positive feedback loop. More warming leads to less biological productivity, which leads to even less cloud cover and more warming, said Kump.
There is a lot of global warming potential in this feedback, he added. (ANI)
Sphere: Related ContentRelated Stories
- Lead may have caused global cooling in 20th century - Apr 20, 2009
- Scientists move closer to "holy grail" of climate change science - May 18, 2009
- Scientists create artificial cloud to learn how high-flying dust reflects radio waves - Sep 22, 2009
- Scientists create artificial cloud to learn how high-flying dust reflects radio waves - Sep 22, 2009
- Atmospheric acid nourishes world's oceans - Oct 06, 2009
- Plants absorb more CO2 under polluted skies - Apr 23, 2009
- How aerosols affect the when, where and how much of rainfall - Sep 10, 2008
- Reduction in airborne dust responsible for recent warming trend in Atlantic Ocean - Mar 27, 2009
- Human activities can worsen 'blue haze', says researcher - Oct 07, 2009
- Scattering clouds may increase global warming - Jul 25, 2009
- 100 million years
- albedo effect
- atmospheric levels
- climate model
- climate models
- cloud condensation nuclei
- cloud droplets
- degree celsius
- degree fahrenheit
- gas carbon dioxide
- global temperatures
- greenhouse gas
- kump
- marine algae
- national geographic news
- pennsylvania state university
- tiny particles
- tropical temperatures
- warm surface waters
- water droplets
Posted in South Asia, |
April 11th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Plant life was so great in that period it was able to support dinosaurs. You might remember those big long neck leaf eaters from the cartoons… Those things fed on the freakishly huge plants that also existed at the time.
This makes sense if you imagine the “greenhouse” effect to be anything like a “greenhouse”. A greenhouse increases plant life with increased levels of carbon dioxide and solar radiation, exactly what the greenhouse effect is supposed to do. I don’t know how the greens say the greenhouse effect will reduce plant life with a straight face.