Pak authorities ‘knowingly relied on perjured testimony’ to convict Daniel Pearl’s killers
January 20th, 2011 - 5:08 pm ICT by ANILondon, Jan 20(ANI): The Daniel Pearl murder investigation report has raised troubling questions about Pakistan’s dysfunctional criminal justice system, and underscored the limits that US officials face in relying on Pakistani authorities.
According to the results of the Pearl Project- an investigation carried out by a team of American journalists and students, and spanning over three years- the four men imprisoned for killing the slain Wall Street Journal reporter did help abduct him, but were not present during his beheading.
The report said they were convicted of murder because Pakistani authorities knowingly relied on perjured testimony and ignored other leads, The Telegraph reports.
According to the report, forensic evidence known as “vein-matching” bolsters the confession of al-Qaeda No. 3 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the professed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, to having killed Pearl.
At least 14 of the 27 people involved in abducting and murdering Pearl are thought to remain free, said the report, adding that the four convicts could be released if their appeal is ever heard, because of false and contradictory evidence used in their trial.
38-year-old Pearl was abducted on January 23, 2002, while researching a story on Islamist militancy following the 9/11 attacks. On February 21, 2002, a video of Pearl’s killing was delivered to US officials in Pakistan, and his remains were found in a shallow grave on Karachi’s outskirts three months later.
Within months of Pearl’s disappearance, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh- a British national of Pakistani heritage, and three accomplices were caught, charged, and convicted of murder and kidnapping.
Sheikh, called the abduction’s mastermind, was sentenced to death in July 2002, while the three others were given life terms, which in Pakistan usually means 25 years. (ANI)
- Murdered Daniel Pearl's dad says 9/11 mosque should be built elsewhere - Aug 27, 2010
- Al Qaeda's 9/11 mastermind killed Daniel Pearl: Report - Jan 20, 2011
- New Details Revealed in Daniel Pearl Murder - Jan 21, 2011
- No 9/11 accused has gone to the gallows - Sep 10, 2011
- 13/7 Mumbai blasts: Police remand of three extended - Feb 10, 2012
- 13/7 blasts: Police remand of four accused extended - Feb 18, 2012
- Al-Qaeda supporter sentenced to 86 years in prison for shooting at U.S. agents - Sep 24, 2010
- British Muslim faces war crimes charges in Bangladesh - Apr 16, 2012
- Six terrorists get life term for plot to kidnap Sachin, Sourav (Second Lead) - Jan 15, 2011
- 9/11 Pakistani mastermind, 4 others sent for trial - Apr 05, 2012
- Insufficient evidence to arrest Hafiz Saeed: Gilani - May 13, 2012
- India toughens anti-hijack policy, but remains vulnerable (12 years after IC-814 hijack) - Dec 23, 2011
- Godhra case should be re-investigated: Prashant Bhushan - Mar 01, 2011
- Life terms for 31 in Gujarat's 2002 Sardarpura massacre - Nov 09, 2011
- Punjab agriculture minister gets one year jail - May 05, 2012
Tags: 9 11 attacks, american journalists, contradictory evidence, criminal justice system, daniel pearl, daniel pearl murder, forensic evidence, investigation report, journal reporter, khalid sheikh mohammed, london jan, militancy, murder investigation, old pearl, omar saeed, pakistani authorities, pakistani heritage, pearl project, shallow grave, wall street journal