“No foreign forces allowed or required to operate inside Pakistan”: Haqqani
December 21st, 2010 - 6:48 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Dec 21 (ANI): Pakistan will not allow any foreign troops to operate on its soil, Pakistan’s Ambassador to the US, Husain Haqqani, has said in response to a media report that US military commanders in Afghanistan are pushing for an expanded campaign of Special Operations ground raids across the border into Pakistan’s tribal areas.
“Pakistani forces are capable of handling the militant threat within our borders, and no foreign forces are allowed or required to operate inside our sovereign territory,” the Dawn quoted Haqqani, as saying.
“US and Pakistani forces understand each others terms of engagement well”, he said, adding that they have a very high-level of cooperation as allies fighting a common enemy along the Afghan border.
“We work with our allies, especially the US, and appreciate their material support, but we will not accept foreign troops on our soil - a position that is well known,” Haqqani stated.
Reminding critics of Pakistan’s anti-terror efforts along the Afghan border, where the country has deployed over 100,000 troops, Haqqani said, “We have made enormous gains and tremendous sacrifices in fighting terrorists over the last two years and will continue our efforts for our own security and that of the whole world.”
The New York Times report had said that the proposal for an expanded campaign, reflecting the growing US frustration with Pakistan’s efforts to root out militants there, would escalate military activities inside Pakistan, where the movement of American forces has been largely prohibited because of fears of provoking a backlash.
The report further said that although the plan had not yet been approved, military and political leaders said that a renewed sense of urgency had taken hold, as the deadline approached for the Obama administration to begin withdrawing its forces from Afghanistan.
However, Haqqani pointed out that Pakistani and US officials remain constantly in touch and “do not need anonymous source news reports to tell us about each others’ thinking.”
In this context, he cited the recent visit of US Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, who had “acknowledged Pakistan’s contribution” during his trip.
“Nothing discussed during his trip indicates the likelihood of ill-advised escalation or unilateral action by NATO troops beyond their mandate in Afghanistan,” said the top Pakistan diplomat in Washington.
Pakistan, Afghanistan and the United States will “continue to work together to root out al Qaeda and other terrorists and bring stability and prosperity to our region,” Haqqani added. (ANI)
- 'Pak military's "dual policy" on terrorist safe havens an open invite to US incursions' - Dec 23, 2010
- Pak needs to do much more against Haqqani network for Afghan peace: Holbrooke - Jul 24, 2010
- Senior Haqqani leader captured in Afghanistan: NATO - Oct 01, 2011
- Unilateral incursion into Pakistan will be disastrous: daily - Oct 20, 2011
- US puts 5 Haqqani Network associates on terrorist list - Sep 30, 2011
- Will act on our own against terror, US warns Pakistan - Sep 30, 2011
- Pakistan has made no attempt to shut down LeT: US Congressman - Nov 04, 2011
- "Only Pakistan will determine when to launch North Waziristan operation": Haqqani - Jan 13, 2011
- US military calls for more trust with Pakistan - Dec 27, 2011
- Kayani warns US against anti-Pakistan offensive - Oct 19, 2011
- Clinton warns of terrorists-pursuit on Afghan-Pakistan border - Oct 20, 2011
- Pakistani army discuss security at emergency meet - Sep 25, 2011
- Pak snubs 'impatient' US' demands for expanding areas for CIA drone operations - Nov 20, 2010
- Haqqanis did not exist during my reign: Musharraf - Oct 07, 2011
- Pak needs to do much more against Haqqani network for Afghan peace: Mullen - Jul 25, 2010
Tags: afghan border, allies, american forces, backlash, borders, common enemy, frustration, husain haqqani, material support, military activities, military commanders, new york times, own security, political leaders, sacrifices, sense of urgency, sovereign territory, special operations, terms of engagement, tribal areas