Islamabad, New Delhi must reduce nuclear risk: Pakistani dailyNovember 13th, 2009 - 1:01 pm ICT by IANS
Islamabad, Nov 13 (IANS) It would be in the interest of Pakistan and India to reduce the “nuclear risk”, a leading Pakistani daily has said in an editorial.
The Daily Times suggested how in an editorial Friday: “First, nuclear risk reduction, … implementing systems to prevent the accidental triggering of these weapons of mass slaughter (and) second, moving away, mutually, from expansion towards mutually agreed reductions.”
Pakistan entered the nuclear arms race in the subcontinent to protect itself from the “original author of this race India”.
Saying that its “arsenal is defensive and confined to a deterrent role”, the editorial observed that any sensible person would recoil with horror at the prospect of nuclear weapons being used in South Asia, the close proximity of the contending countries and their neighbours posing a critical threat to all in the unthinkable event of “a nuclear exchange”.
A report of the standing committee on defence regarding the National Command Authority (NCA) bill 2007 has been laid before the National Assembly.
The timing of the report’s presentation suggests to some observers the urgency of allaying the fears expressed by the Western media following journalist Seymour Hersh’s piece in the New Yorker regarding the safety and security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.
“The greater concern is not about any external force gaining access to the arsenal. The apprehension being expressed concerns internal leakage of technology and/or the weapons themselves. The beneficiaries of such a hypothetical leakage, according to Western media reports, could be the terrorists operating within and around Pakistan.”
The least likely scenario would be that a weapon could actually be spirited away by some inimical personnel.
“A nuclear weapon is not a piece of candy or a lollipop that can be secreted away in a pocket to be calmly taken away under the nose of tight security,” the editorial said, adding: “Our weapons have been dispersed and rendered impossible to use without proper authorisation precisely to pre-empt any such possibility and even prevent the accidental use of these deadly weapons.”
The real apprehension in the minds of those fundamentally hostile to the existence of this capability is that the very personnel charged with the responsibility to ensure their security may be infected sufficiently by jihadi ideology to consider leaking vital information and/or equipment to the terrorists currently battling against the Pakistani state.
It, however, assured that officials in positions of high authority have been emphasising consistently that no such threat exists or will be allowed to rear its head.
- Pak nuke build-up has US anxious and worried: NYT editorial - Feb 22, 2011
- 'Informal understanding' exits between Mullen, Kayani over Pak's nuke assets:Hersh - Nov 11, 2009
- Pakistan vows to protect its strategic, nuclear assets - Jul 15, 2011
- Pakistan has bigger nuke arsenal than India: Report - Aug 02, 2010
- Pak's nuke arms expansion posing direct challenge to US policy: Report - Feb 01, 2011
- Nukes needed to deter blackmail by other powers: India (Lead) - Aug 21, 2012
- India's 'massive' arms build up will jeopardise regional balance: Pak - Jan 14, 2010
- Real threat to Pakistan not from India: daily - May 29, 2011
- Pakistan threatens to undertake nuke arms race over India's NSG membership bid - Jan 28, 2011
- US 'confident' Pakistani nukes safe - Nov 10, 2011
- Pakistan should get over its obsession with India: Daily - Aug 16, 2011
- Nukes protect India from blackmail by other powers: Menon - Aug 21, 2012
- No intention of seizing Pakistani nuclear weapons: US - Nov 10, 2009
- As summit gets underway, opinion builds on Pak rogue elements - Apr 13, 2010
- "CIA spy" Davis was giving nuclear bomb material to Al-Qaeda, says report - Feb 20, 2011
Tags: close proximity, critical threat, implementing systems, islamabad, journalist seymour hersh, mass slaughter, nuclear arms race, nuclear arsenal, nuclear exchange, nuclear risk reduction, nuclear weapon, nuclear weapons, piece of candy, recoil, sensible person, seymour hersh, South Asia, spirited away, standing committee, tight security