Is Pakistan heading towards global isolation, wonders daily
December 13th, 2011 - 1:12 pm ICT by IANS
Islamabad, Dec 13 (IANS) Is Pakistan treading the path towards global isolation, asked a Pakistani daily that said the steps taken by Islamabad following the Nov 26 NATO airstrikes could “end up hurting” the country.
Pakistan had reacted in anger to the Nov 26 NATO airstrikes that left two dozen soldiers dead in Mohmand Agency. It cut off NATO supply and directed the US to vacate the Shamsi airbase, near Quetta in Baluchistan province, that was used to launch drone attacks.
An editorial in the Daily Times Tuesday said that it was incredible how successive governments in Pakistan have been so generous in the distribution of land to foreign governments for their exclusive use.
“First, the Shamsi airbase was given to the UAE… In 2001, it was then handed over to the US as a launch pad for drone strikes across the border in Afghanistan, and on the tribal areas in Pakistan,” the daily noted.
“Similarly, PAF Shahbaz Base - which was also given to the US - has been off-limits to the citizens of Pakistan even though the ministry of defence still denies the presence of any foreign soldiers there and claims that the base is under the control of the PAF,” it said.
The editorial said that following the Nov 26 attack, “our government decided to finally put its foot down, saying that Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity need to be safeguarded at all costs and the way to do that was by renegotiating its relationship with the US”.
It went on to say that the new terms of engagement with NATO - “in the ‘interests of the country’s sovereignty’ - would leave Pakistan conveniently able to protect the safe havens it has given to the Afghan Taliban from being attacked and thus allowing it to pursue its proxy war in Afghanistan without any fear of interference”.
“…the government is clearly determined to back the ambitions of the military establishment. But the repercussions of this would be grave not only for Afghanistan and the region, but devastating for Pakistan as well.”
“With a new foreign policy vis-à-vis the US in the process of formulation, have the long-term implications arising from such a policy been understood? With this policy, is Pakistan treading the path towards global isolation?” questioned the editorial.
It suggested that if that is indeed the chosen path, “the government ought to think again”.
“In a highly interconnected and interdependent world and for a country highly dependent on foreign aid, this policy is stoking the fire and may end up hurting the whole of Pakistan, rather than just its sovereignty.”
- US to meet deadline for vacating airbase: Pakistan - Dec 08, 2011
- US starts vacating Pakistani airbase - Dec 04, 2011
- US resumes drone attacks in Pakistan - Jan 12, 2012
- Pakistan to US: vacate Shamsi airbase by Dec 11 - Dec 01, 2011
- Pakistan right to be angry over NATO airstrike, says daily - Nov 28, 2011
- Drone attack a violation of sovereignty: Pakistan - Jan 13, 2012
- No compromise on sovereignty: Pakistan PM - Dec 14, 2011
- Pakistan-US ties have hit all-time low: Daily - Nov 30, 2011
- Pakistan's sovereignty must not be violated: Envoy - Dec 09, 2011
- Gilani sets conditions for relations with US - Dec 21, 2011
- US can contact me whenever they want: Hafiz Saeed - Apr 04, 2012
- Drones will strike as long as US wants: Pakistani daily - Feb 24, 2012
- Pakistan shoots down NATO airstrike probe report (Lead) - Dec 23, 2011
- US set fire to equipment before leaving Pakistan airbase - Dec 12, 2011
- $10 mn bounty on me for opposing NATO supplies: Hafiz Saeed - Apr 03, 2012
Tags: afghan taliban, airbase, ambitions, country pakistan, dozen soldiers, drone, foot down, launch pad, military establishment, ministry of defence, nato airstrikes, proxy war, quetta, repercussions, safe havens, sovereignty, terms of engagement, territorial integrity, tribal areas, war in afghanistan