Gilani doublespeak: From peace overtures, now tells NATO fears war with IndiaJune 5th, 2010 - 2:22 pm ICT by ANI
Brussels, Jun.5 (ANI): Just when things were starting to get back on track between India and Pakistan, and a ‘positive’ outcome from the upcoming Foreign Ministerial level talks was expected, Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s tirade over New Delhi’s conventional war strategy has once again put light on Islamabad’s obstinate attitude concerning resolving long pending issues with the neighbouring nation.
Addressing the North Atlantic Council (NAC) here, Gilani urged the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) to take active interest in South Asian security perspectives, saying his country is facing a continuous war threat from the Indian Army’s Pakistan centric strategies.
“We remain concerned over Pakistan-specific Indian military doctrines such as the Cold Start envisaging a limited conventional war under the nuclear overhang, huge increase in Indian military budget and massive weapon acquisitions,” The News quoted Gilani, as saying.
“These together with discriminatory policies especially in the nuclear and technological arena have accentuated the regional imbalance in South Asia,” he added.
Gilani once against raked the long pending issues between India and Pakistan on the international stage, saying outstanding disputes such as Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek, and the river water sharing require a just and peaceful resolution, as these issues have a significant bearing on South Asia’s security.
Gilani said that Pakistan wants to resolve all impending issues with India peacefully through composite dialogue, which, he said, was stalled after the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks due to ‘ostensible reasons’ tabled by New Delhi.
He stressed that Pakistan acted swiftly against the 26/11 suspects and put them behind bars, which indicated that his country ’sincerely’ wanted to cooperate with India.”We have done our utmost to bring the perpetrators to justice. We have indicated to India that only serious, sustained and pragmatic cooperation is the sure way of addressing each others concerns on terrorism,” Gilani said.
Without mentioning India, which Pakistan claims is using Afghanistan’s soil to launch terror activities inside its territory, Gilani said Islamabad would never allow terrorists to use the country’s soil for any militant activities, and neither would it permit the use of its neighbouring territories against Pakistan.
“It is our national resolve not to allow terrorists any space on our territory. Equally, we will not permit the use of territory of our neighbours for sponsoring, supporting or abetting acts of terror against Pakistan,” he said. (ANI)
- Peace dividend: India allows investments from Pakistan (Lead) - Aug 01, 2012
- Pakistan should not allow anti-India activities, says PM - Jun 07, 2010
- Pak can't guarantee against repeat of 26/11: Gilani - Jan 22, 2010
- India asks Pak not to allow territory under its control to spread terrorism - Sep 29, 2010
- Stop state-sponsored terrorism in Kashmir: India tells Pakistan (Lead) - Sep 30, 2010
- New cross-LoC CBMs on anvil; 26/11, Fai to figure in India-Pakistan talks (Second Lead) - Jul 24, 2011
- No dialogue if Pakistan backs terrorism: PM (Lead) - Aug 15, 2010
- Terror from Pakistan-controlled territory a core concern: India - Nov 24, 2011
- `Pakistan, India trade talks to give peace a chance' - Feb 15, 2012
- India, Pakistan to ease cross-Kashmir trade, travel (Lead) - Jul 23, 2011
- Dialogue the only way, but Pakistan must control terror machine: PM (Second Lead) - Mar 05, 2010
- Day 2 of talks: India and Pakistan discuss Kashmir - Jun 24, 2011
- India, Pakistan discuss 26/11, Samjhauta, CBMs on Day 1 (Second Intro Roundup) - Jun 24, 2011
- Indo-Pak Foreign Secretaries likely to meet in Thimphu next month - Jan 09, 2011
- Pakistan, India cannot afford war: Gilani (Lead) - Jan 02, 2011
Tags: atlantic treaty organisation, composite dialogue, continuous war, conventional war, discriminatory policies, india and pakistan, indian army, massive weapon, military budget, military doctrines, ministerial level, north atlantic treaty organisation, peace overtures, regional imbalance, siachen, sir creek, south asian security, technological arena, war strategy, water sharing