Don’t drag ISI into 26/11 trial, says Pakistan
November 25th, 2010 - 6:56 pm ICT by IANS
By Awais Saleem
Islamabad, Nov 25 (IANS) It was “improper to unnecessarily drag Pakistani intelligence agency ISI” into the Mumbai terror attack trial, Pakistan said Thursday, a day after a US court summoned the ISI chief and other officials in response to a case filed by relatives of two American 26/11 victims.
At his weekly briefing in Islamabad, Pakistani Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit said: “We are serious in taking punitive action against the culprits of 26/11 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, but it is improper to unnecessarily drag Pakistani intelligence agency ISI in it.”
He said he has no knowledge that “the ISI chief was summoned in a US court in connection with 26/11 probe”.
The summons were issued by a New York court to ISI’s powerful chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, and other officials Major Samir Ali, Azam Cheema and Major Iqbal, as aslo Pasha’s predecesor Lt.Gen. Nadeem Taj. Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) commander Zakiur Rahman Lakhvi and Jamaat-ud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed, the alleged masterminds of the Nov 26-29, 2008, Mumbai terror attack, also have been summoned.
The 26-page lawsuit was filed before a Brooklyn court last week by family members of Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his pregnant wife, Rivka, who were among the 166 people killed during the attack. Their son Moshe was saved by his Indian nanny Sandra in the tragedy.
The suit alleges that ISI “provided critical planning, material support, control and coordination for the attacks” to the Pakistan-based militant group LeT, which has been blamed for the 26/11 siege. The LeT is also named in the suit.
On composite dialogue, Basit said that “India is only paying lip-service as far as the composite dialogue is concerned and has shown no inclination towards the resumption of stalled talks”.
He said that “bilateral relations between India and Pakistan cannot improve without settling the Kashmir dispute”.
Bilateral talks between Pakistan and India hit a roadblock after the Mumbai attack when India accused Pakistani militant outfits for it.
The visit of Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna to Islamabad in July this year was expected to break the ice, but was also marred by a deadlock when the joint communique could not be issued because of differences on inclusion of Kashmir dispute in it.
During the briefing, Basit said that the “country will never allow drone attacks in Balochistan”.
Washington Post had carried a report a few days ago claiming that US had sought permission from Islamabad for drone strikes in Balochistan province to target suspected hideouts of Al-Qaeda and Taliban.
(Awais Saleem can be contacted at ians.pakistan@gmail.com)
- Dragging ISI into Mumbai attack preposterous: Pak FO - Nov 26, 2010
- Pakistan to contest US court notices to ISI officials - Dec 31, 2010
- US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case - Nov 24, 2010
- ISI chief won't appear in US court over Mumbai attack: Gilani (Lead) - Dec 23, 2010
- India may implead in US court to establish ISI's terror link - May 29, 2011
- Pakistan unlikely to defend Hafiz Saeed in 26/11 US lawsuit - Jan 14, 2011
- Pakistan to defend ISI officials in Mumbai attacks lawsuit filed in US court - Dec 31, 2010
- Pak wishes to see Mumbai terror attack culprits punished: Qureshi - Nov 27, 2010
- US court summons ISI chiefs, LeT leaders in 2008 Mumbai terror attack case - Dec 23, 2010
- Pakistan says no to US drone strikes in Balochistan - Nov 20, 2010
- Rana trial jury yet to reach verdict - Jun 09, 2011
- Pak motives point to "protecting" rather than "prosecuting " 26/11 terror suspects: Analyst - Apr 15, 2011
- 26/11 attackers must be punished: Pakistan foreign minister - Nov 26, 2010
- Hafiz Saeed seeks Pakistan government aid in Mumbai case - Jan 13, 2011
- MQM criticises US court order against Pak intelligence personnel - Dec 26, 2010
Tags: awais, bilateral talks, brooklyn court, composite dialogue, gavriel, holtzberg, india and pakistan, indian nanny, intelligence agency, isi chief, jamaat ud dawa, kashmir dispute, lashkar e taiba, office spokesman, page lawsuit, predecesor, punitive action, shuja, suit alleges that, terror attack