Detention of Hindraf leaders not according to procedureJanuary 25th, 2008 - 1:25 pm ICT by admin
Kuala Lumpur, Jan 25 (ANI): The detention of five Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) leaders last month was not carried out by the Malaysian Police according to procedures spelt out in the Internal Security Act 1960, lawyer Karpal Singh said in the High Court.
Karpal Singh submitted at a habeas corpus hearing that the orders given out for Hindraf leaders were only valid for detention but not arrest, which ought to have been carried out before the detention.
He said the first respondent in the case; the Internal Security Minister and Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had not applied the law in a just manner.
Karpal Singh added that had there been an arrest, P. Uthayakumar, V. Ganabathirau and T. Vasanthakumar, and lawyers R. Kenghadharan and M. Manoharan, would have been investigated and given 60 days to put up a defence before the minister made an order of detention under the ISA.
He said there was a procedural non-compliance when the minister proceeded to make the order of detention under section 8(1) of the ISA without affecting an arrest under section 73(1) which he was required to do.
“Section 8(1) does not provide for arrest. It only confers power on the minister to make an order of detention. This is also a fatal flaw which nullifies the applicant’s initial arrest and continued detention at the detention centre in Perak,” he said.
The New Straits Times Online quoted Karpal as saying that the representation against the detention of the five, which was addressed to the ISA Advisory Board chairman, was instead directed to the board’s secretary.
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail in his reply said the respondents did comply with the procedural requirements when issuing the order of detention. (ANI)
- Hindraf leaders ask Malaysian Govt. to free them unconditionally - May 20, 2009
- Court dismisses Indians' plea against Malaysian PM - Mar 25, 2011
- Malaysian Indian challenges government order on party registration - Apr 07, 2011
- Malaysia's apex court rejects Hindraf leaders' appeals - Apr 17, 2009
- Malaysian Indian loses court appeal over LTTE link charge - Mar 10, 2011
- Malaysia frees three Hindraf leaders detained under ISA - May 10, 2009
- Hindraf lawyers third bail plea dismissed - Nov 13, 2008
- Hindraf adviser's third freedom bid rejected by Malaysian court - Nov 13, 2008
- Kuala Lumpur High Court to take decision on Hindraf leaders' case on Feb 26 - Jan 29, 2008
- Malaysian Indians moving away from opposition alliance: Report - Apr 06, 2011
- ISA advisory board to decide fate of Hindraf leaders - Jan 11, 2008
- Detention of HINDRAF leaders unconstitutional, says their lawyer - Apr 03, 2008
- Malaysian court upholds Hindraf leaders' detention - May 15, 2008
- HINDRAF leader's detention violates Malaysian law, says lawyer - Dec 15, 2007
- Malaysian Indian sues officials over LTTE link charge - Sep 11, 2009
Tags: abdullah ahmad badawi, advisory board, board chairman, habeas corpus, hindu, initial arrest, internal security act, isa, kuala lumpur, malaysian police, manoharan, new straits times, perak, prime minister abdullah ahmad badawi, procedural requirements, respondent, respondents, section 73, section 8, security minister