New Study Published In ‘Biology Letters’ Challenges The Theory Of Evolution Of The Famed Charles Darwin

August 25th, 2010 - 8:07 pm ICT by Pen Men At Work  

August 25, 2010 (Pen Men at Work): A new study has the potential to shudder the very fundamentals of Darwin’s theory of evolution. This study has mentioned that ‘living space’, and not struggle, was the chief motivating force behind evolution.

The aforementioned study conducted at the University of Bristol asserts that Charles Darwin may have been erroneous when he envisioned a globe in which creatures vied for domination and only the most energetic survived. The consequences of this study have been printed in Biology Letters. This study has been authored by Sarda Sahney, Michael Benton and Paul Ferry.

PhD student Sarda Sahney and her collaborators utilized fossils to evaluate evolutionary samples over 400 million years of history. These researchers have declared that the quantity of biodiversity closely harmonized the accessibility of living space through time.

Living space is officially identified as the ‘ecological niche concept’ by the natural scientists. Living space denotes the specific necessities of an organism to flourish. It consists of aspects like the accessibility of foodstuffs and a positive habitation. For example, birds that flew for the initial time launched a huge series of new prospects not obtainable to other mammals.

Sarda Sahney has mentioned in the study that, all the way through geographical time, samples of worldwide assortment of tetrapod families illustrate 97 per cent correspondence with ecological modes.

BBC News has cited Professor Michael Benton as uttering that the mammals resided at the side of dinosaurs for 60 million years. Still, they were unable to overpower the powerful dinosaurs. However, when the dinosaurs underwent annihilation, the other animals rapidly occupied the empty places left behind by the dinosaurs. In the world of today, mammals rule the land.

Professor Stephen Stearns happens to be an evolutionary naturalist at Yale University. He, however, does not have the same opinion. He has declared that he deemed that the samples of the aforementioned study were attention-grabbing but the elucidation was knotty. He has remarked that the drive to dwell in new segments of ecological space is to steer clear of rivalry with the species in the space already occupied.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Sci-Tech |

Subscribe