Good Samaritans’ content as reliable as registered Wikipedia usersNovember 14th, 2007 - 2:27 am ICT by admin
In the study, the scientists analysed Wikipedia, which has an archive of the history of changes and edits to its entries.
This facilitated them to examine Wikipedia authors and the quality of content as measured by how long and how much of it persisted before being changed or corrected.
“This finding was both novel and unexpected,” Denise Anthony, associate professor of sociology said.
“In traditional laboratory studies of collective goods, we don’t include Good Samaritans, those people who just happen to pass by and contribute, because those carefully designed studies don’t allow for outside actors,” she said.
“It took a real-life situation for us to recognize and appreciate the contributions of Good Samaritans to web content,” she added.
After subdividing the analysis by registered versus anonymous contributors, the researchers found that among those who contribute often, registered users are more reliable and they discovered that among those who contribute only a little, the anonymous users are more reliable.
The researchers found that the reliability of Good Samaritans’ contributions were at least as high as that of the more reputable registered users’ contributions.
“Wikipedia is a great example of how open-source contributions work for the greater good,” co-authors Sean Smith, associate professor of computer science said.
“And because it welcomes input from anyone, not just programmers and geeks, it is a great research tool. We can mine information from Wikipedia that helps us understand human behaviour,” he said.
Anthony said that Wikipedia must register the anonymous contributors who make numerous edits to the site.
“This will probably limit the number of low-quality contributions we find among high-use anonymous contributors, because in exposing their identity, they will have their reputation to consider,” Anthony said.
“I don’t foresee this new policy affecting the quality of those Good Samaritans, though. Their presence should continue to be valuable,” he added. (ANI)
- Wikipedia to recruit more women writers - Feb 02, 2011
- Maps on Wikipedia depict people's view: Founder - Nov 18, 2011
- Wikipedia top rated for mental health information - Feb 16, 2012
- Is Wikipedia heading for bust? - Aug 05, 2009
- Quality of Wikipedia entries depends on authors' collaboration - Mar 12, 2010
- Wikipedia too complicated to edit, says founder Jimmy Wales - Jan 14, 2011
- Wikipedia Faced Technical Difficulties Due To Power Outage - Jul 05, 2010
- UK academics want to turn Wikipedia into official research tool - Mar 23, 2011
- Mumbai to host first WikiConference in India - Nov 09, 2011
- Wikipedia 'a good source for political info' - Apr 15, 2011
- Wikipedians slam study tagging them bunch of egocentric introverts - Jul 09, 2009
- Wikipedia entries full of factual errors, says researcher - Apr 18, 2012
- Wikipedia to shut for 24 hours, youngsters unaffected - Jan 17, 2012
- Wikipedia eases editing restrictions on controversial pages - Jun 16, 2010
- Wikipedia tightens editing policy to prevent online vandalism - Aug 27, 2009
Tags: anonymous contributors, anonymous users, associate professor, collective goods, dartmouth researchers, denise anthony, good samaritans, great research, human behaviour, laboratory studies, life situation, low quality, quality content, quality contributions, research tool, source contributions, they discovered that, traditional laboratory, wikipedia