Draw line between objectionable and controversial, say websites
December 6th, 2011 - 8:33 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Dec 6 (IANS) Even as Communications Minister Kapil Sibal Tuesday said India will not tolerate objectionable content on social networking websites, Facebook and Google said they already have checks in place but it is difficult to differentiate between objectionable and controversial content.
Google said there was a need to differentiate between what was controversial and what was illegal, adding that anything that went against statute was removed by their team, including content that went against their strict terms and conditions.
“But it also means that when content is legal but controversial, we don’t remove it because people’s differing views should be respected, so long as they are legal,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement.
The confusion remained on who will decide what is tantamount to “hurting” religious sentiments or an individual’s personal integrity and privacy.
Sibal told reporters here that his ministry would come out with guidelines and a framework to curb such content on the net.
The representatives of these sites also pointed out to the sheer logistical nightmare in screening every bit of content that is posted on the sites.
“We will remove any content that violates our terms, which are designed to keep material that is hateful, threatening, incites violence or contains nudity off the service,” said Facebook in a statement issued Tuesday.
“We want Facebook to be a place where people can discuss things freely, while respecting the rights and feelings of others, which is why we already have policies and on-site features in place that enable people to report abusive content,” it added.
For these social networking sites, Indians form among the largest online communities. Facebook, for example, says that out of 800 million users globally, 34 million are in India — the third largest such group country-wise, after the US and Indonesia.
- Netizens tweet foul as India targets 'objectionable' content - Dec 06, 2011
- Forced to think of guidelines for social sites: Sibal - Dec 09, 2011
- Sibal meets social media companies over content screening - Dec 15, 2011
- Foul content on websites hurts religious Indians, court told - Feb 14, 2012
- Foul content on websites hurts religious Indians, court told (Lead) - Feb 14, 2012
- Social media code: Congress cautious, BJP opposes Sibal's way - Dec 08, 2011
- Website content: Google, Facebook plea to be heard Aug 7 - May 03, 2012
- All websites should operate within Indian laws: Pilot - Feb 07, 2012
- Scrap derogatory content by Feb 6, court asks websites (Third Lead) - Dec 24, 2011
- Content screening: Facebook, others to reply in 15 days (Lead) - Feb 06, 2012
- Censoring social media curbs free speech, say netizens - Jan 16, 2012
- Court dismisses Facebook India plea - May 30, 2012
- Need to utilise laws to remove defamatory material: Assocham - Dec 07, 2011
- Hate censorship, but freedom often misused: Omar - Dec 06, 2011
- Court puts off hearing on Google, Facebook pleas (Lead) - Jan 19, 2012
Tags: abusive content, confusion, controversial content, facebook, feelings, google, indians, kapil sibal, logistical nightmare, New Delhi, nudity, objectionable content, online communities, personal integrity, place where people, religious sentiments, site features, social networking sites, spokesperson, strict terms