Buying and selling habitats may help save wildlife in the long-termNovember 14th, 2007 - 2:12 am ICT by admin
The European Commission has now expressed an interest in using tradable permits for wildlife conservation, in a recent green paper on market instruments in environmental policy.
The paper calls it habitat banking. The idea is that each region sets a target for how much land it wants to keep for wildlife conservation, then leaves it up to the free market to find the most cost-effective way of doing it.
If a developer wants to destroy valuable habitat, he or she has to purchase a permit to do so, from someone who has created a piece of valuable habitat elsewhere.
European law requires developers who destroy valuable habitat to recreate something equivalent elsewhere. ut according to Florian Hartig, a researcher from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Germany, using tradable permits is more flexible.
“The current mitigation policy is very strict. Flexible instruments can help allocating mitigation where it is most effective,” he says.
With habitat banking, landowners who upgrade their land for wildlife get an immediate financial gain.
And it would be possible for those with an interest in conservation to stockpile permits and not sell them, increasing the conservation value of the region perhaps even above the target.
European ecologists and economists are studying how such a market could work in theory.
They presented their work last week at the European Science Foundation’s (ESF) first EuroDIVERSITY conference.
They said that a problem that immediately surfaced from an ecological perspective was that the value of one piece of wildlife habitat partly depends on how near it is to other pieces of wildlife habitat.
This problem, they said, could be surmounted by building a measure of connectivity into the ecological value of each piece of land.
Many ecologists felt it would be difficult to give a piece of land a single ecological value.
“The best sites for birds are not always the best for plants, or microbes,” one argued. The researchers admit the evaluation process will be complex.
The biggest advantage of habitat banking is cheaper conservation, according to Frank W
- Farming vital for endangered species - Dec 05, 2011
- CII, World Bank Group ink pact to save tiger (With Images) - Jun 27, 2012
- Coal mining destroying tiger habitat, says report - Nov 22, 2011
- Human behavior may determine environmental changes - Apr 16, 2011
- Bio-energy crops could be ruinous to wildlife - Apr 04, 2012
- Highlights of panel report on Vedanta - Aug 24, 2010
- The white ghost of the Himalayas: A vision in the snow (Feature) - Mar 11, 2012
- Green panels protest construction in Greater Noida wetlands - Nov 15, 2011
- New norms for shifting people from forests withdrawn - Mar 07, 2011
- To save world's tigers, save their preys: Scientists - Nov 24, 2010
- 'Move it or lose it' ultimatum for species conservation - Oct 02, 2010
- Habitat loss drives Sumatran tiger to verge of extinction - Feb 29, 2012
- Sparrow decline indicates serious environmental change: Experts - May 09, 2012
- Loss of habitats irreplaceable, warn scientists - Aug 01, 2012
- Highways through Indian tiger reserves will destroy habitat - Apr 16, 2012
Tags: conservation value, cultural landscapes, ecological perspective, ecologists, european law, european science, farmland, financial gain, flexible instruments, global environmental policy, helmholtz, landowners, market instruments, mitigation, most cost effective, science foundation, stockpile, target, wildlife conservation, wildlife habitat