Thaindian News

Washington, June 16 (IANS) Babies are a lot smarter than we can think of, says a new study.
It suggests that even before they learn to babble, babies are organising information about numbers, space and time in more complex ways than previously realised.

“We’ve shown that nine-month-olds are sensitive to ‘more than’ or ‘less than’ relations across the number, size and duration of objects,” says Stella Lourenco, Emory University psychologist, who led the study.

“And what’s really remarkable is they only need experience with one of these quantitative concepts in order to guess what the other quantities should look like,” adds Lourenco.

Lourenco collaborated with neuroscientist Matthew Longo of University College London for the study, scheduled for publication in Psychological Science.

In his 1890 masterwork, “The Principles of Psychology”, William James described the baby’s impression of the world as “one great blooming, buzzing confusion”. Accumulating evidence is turning that long-held theory on its head.

“Our findings indicate that humans use information about quantity to organise their experience of the world from the first few months of life,” Lourenco says.

“Quantity appears to be a powerful tool for making predictions about how objects should behave.”

Lourenco focuses on the development of spatial perception, and how it interfaces with other cognitive dimensions, such as numerical processing and the perception of time.

Previous research suggests that these different cognitive domains are deeply connected at a neural level. Tests show, for instance, that adults associate smaller numbers with the left side of space and larger numbers with the right.

“It’s like we have a ruler in our heads,” Lourenco says of the phenomenon.

Other tests show that when adults are asked to quickly select the higher of two numbers, the task becomes much harder if the higher number is represented as physically smaller than the lower number.

Lourenco wanted to explore whether our brains just pick up on statistical regularities through repeated experience and language associations, or whether a generalised system of magnitude is present early in life.

Her lab designed a study that showed groups of objects on a computer screen to nine-month-old infants.

“Babies like to stare when they see something new,” Lourenco explains, “and we can measure the length of time that they look at these things to understand how they process information.”

When the infants were shown images of larger objects that were black with stripes and smaller objects that were white with dots, they then expected the same colour-pattern mapping for more-and-less comparisons of number and duration.

For instance, if the more numerous objects were white with dots, the babies would stare at the image longer than if the objects were black with stripes, says an Emory release.

“When the babies look longer, that suggests that they are surprised by the violation of congruency,” Lourenco says. “They appear to expect these different dimensions to correlate in the world.”

The findings suggest that humans may be born with a generalised system of magnitude. “If we are not born with this system, it appears that it develops very quickly,” Lourenco says.