Newsweek editor in Buddha controversy
January 2nd, 2010 - 3:14 pm ICT by IANS ( 4 comments )By Sudeshna Sarkar
Kathmandu, Jan 2 (IANS) A year after Bollywood film “Chandni Chowk to China” triggered an uproar in Nepal with its claim that Gautam Buddha, the founder of Buddhism, was born in India, an internationally acclaimed journalist and author has stoked the controversy afresh.
Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek and host of a weekly show on international affairs for CNN, has given a fresh lease of life to the controversy by making the same claim.
Zakaria’s new book, “The Post American World”, says that though the Buddha was an Indian and Buddhism was born in India, there are no true Buddhists in the subcontinent.
A committee in Nepal has raised objections to the statement in parliament and the matter is said to have reached President Ram Baran Yadav, as well as the foreign and home ministries.
Though the book was published in May 2009, it took longer to reach Nepal.
The controversy became public Saturday after the spokesman of the opposition Maoist party, Dinanath Sharma, protested against the claim in Nepal’s largest daily Kantipur.
“Are we ready to believe that Zakaria wrote this without studying about the Buddha?” the Maoist MP asked.
Zakaria is a Yale graduate and a PhD in political science from Harvard.
“You can’t say a man doesn’t know where the Buddha was born when he is minutely dissecting all religions.”
The Maoist MP indicated that the erroneous statement by Zakaria, “an American of Indian origin”, is linked to the “propaganda by traitors” to wrongly inform the world that the Buddha was born in India.
Some school texts in India also propagate this while in India’s border area, there is an effort to build a “false Lumbini” - the kingdom in southern Nepal where the Buddha was born - to perpetuate the myth, Sharma said.
“This is an expression of the Indian government’s expansionist policy,” the Maoist leader said.
Zakaria is the third American author to make the same statement about the Buddha.
“A History of Knowledge: Past, Present and Future” by American author Charles Van Doren and a prescribed text for postgraduate students in Nepal makes the same claim.
So does the 2005 novel “Saving Fish From Drowning” by acclaimed author Amy Tan.
- Nepal's Buddha epic to boost birthplace campaign - Feb 26, 2010
- Concern in Nepal as China tries to 'develop' Buddha legacy - Jul 28, 2011
- Hollywood director thought Buddha, Everest belonged to India - Jul 24, 2011
- UN denies signing controversial Buddha birthplace deal - Aug 19, 2011
- Nepal dismisses Indian state's 'claim' to Buddha birthplace - Apr 07, 2011
- Buddha protests continue in Nepal - Feb 03, 2009
- Nepal's oldest varsity in Buddha controversy now - Jan 25, 2009
- Nepal Maoists inked secret pact with Chinese NGO - Aug 09, 2011
- Nepal Maoists defend disputed Buddha birthplace deal - Aug 10, 2011
- Nepal Maoists deny link to Iqbal Kaskar shooting - May 19, 2011
- Sri Lanka gift brings Buddha alive in Nepal - May 17, 2011
- `Delhi Belly' still quarantined in Nepal - Jul 05, 2011
- 'Nepal king ordered destruction of Buddha statue' - Aug 08, 2011
- First Buddha film from Nepal to pre-empt Bollywood challenges - Jul 09, 2011
- Nepal Maoists deny getting arms training in India - Dec 31, 2010
Tags: american author, baran, border area, chowk, cnn, erroneous statement, fareed zakaria, founder of buddhism, gautam buddha, indian government, indian origin, kantipur, lumbini, maoist, phd in political science, sarkar, school texts, southern nepal, uproar, yale graduate
January 3rd, 2010 at 12:25 am
products of Harvard uni are for sure pieces of crap.
January 3rd, 2010 at 12:55 am
This is India trying to steal the thunder from Nepal. Buddha was born in Lumbini which is part of Nepal. Nepal is a sovereign independent state. In Lanka, we learn that the great Buddha is Nepali but he attained enlightenment in India because he saw the abject poverty that indians live in. So India does have a part to play, but Buddha is a Nepali. We learn Buddishm comes from India because enlightenment was reached in India when Buddha saw the poverty that was found in India but this enlightenment came to a Nepali prince, who did not see such poverty in Nepal.
It cultural thievery to say otherwise. Concepts of Akhand Bharat is geographical hegemony. India needs to stop doing this to smaller countries.
March 20th, 2010 at 9:19 pm
Buddha was born in Nepal and Buddhism was born in India…
December 4th, 2011 at 2:09 am
Very well said Mr.Jayasinghe. Nepal holds a strong relations but time and again such news, without any proper facts and figures are very insulting to Nepalese. Until, we learn to respect our neighboring countries, we cannot expect the same from them. Many of my friends, believe that Nepal being a part of India, Mt.Everest in India, and so on and this triggers my Nepalese Friends,and this is very obvious. To my Fellow Indians, a small Note: Nepal, Bhutan and Sri lanka were never a part of India and they were sovereign countries from day 0. Mt.Everest is in Nepal and not in India. Gautam Buddha was born in Nepal and not in India. Nepal do not have “Independence Day” but have “Republic Day”, a day symbolizing downfall of Monarchy.