Internet would have made 1975 Emergency a fiasco: JaitleyMay 17th, 2012 - 5:12 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, May 17 (IANS) Had internet been there, the Emergency of 1975 would have been a “fiasco”, said Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley Thursday as the upper house of parliament took up a debate on a motion to annul a set of government’s rules on internet.
A motion to annul the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011, moved by P. Rajeeve of the Communist Party of India-Marxist was taken up by the Rajya Sabha in the morning.
The rules, enforced in April 2011, have been perceived largely as an indirect censorship of internet content. The set of rules require that all intermediaries, which includes all those who provide internet, telecom, e-mail or blogging services, and cyber cafes, have to remove content that is “grossly harmful, harassing, blasphemous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, paedophilic, libellous, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically objectionable, disparaging, relating or encouraging money laundering or gambling, or otherwise unlawful in any manner whatever”.
Participating in the debate, Jaitley pointed out that the 1975 Emergency would have failed if internet had been there.
“If internet had been in existence, Emergency would have been a fiasco,” Jaitley said.
“You can control print and electronic media, but not internet. The circulation would have been so wide, the fear psychosis had been demolished,” he said.
Objecting to the government’s set of rules for internet, Jaitley said terms such as defamatory, libellous and disparaging could be misused.
“Someone can criticise me or my party; it will be disparaging for me. But do I have the right to say: ‘Take it off the (inter)net’? The words the way they are framed have huge possibility of future misuse,” he said.
Stating that the content on internet may be defamatory to one person or another, Jaitley also joked that by restricting all that is defamatory, “we will have a very boring internet”.
Speaking earlier, Rajeeve pointed out that the rules were a violation of the right to freedom of speech.
“This rule is violation of the Constitution, Article 19(2), which gives freedom of speech… The rules violate principle of natural justice and are ultra vires of the parent act and the constitution,” he said.
He also quoted UN rapporteur’s report that censorship on net should not be relegated to private entities.
- Government wants consensus on rules on internet content (Lead) - May 18, 2012
- Social media content creators need protection: Experts - Mar 29, 2012
- New content control rules leave netizens sore - May 11, 2011
- Google accused of breaching Spain's privacy law - Jan 17, 2011
- Five reasons why India can't censor the Internet (Comment) - Dec 07, 2011
- Need to utilise laws to remove defamatory material: Assocham - Dec 07, 2011
- Internet content control rule has industry backing - Aug 03, 2011
- Cyber attacks, censorship threat to internet freedom: Study - Apr 18, 2011
- Government all for Internet freedom: NSA - May 16, 2012
- Rushdie episode worst communal vote bank politics: BJP (Second Lead) - Jan 24, 2012
- Stalling parliament also part of democracy: BJP (Lead) - Sep 07, 2012
- Netizens tweet foul as India targets 'objectionable' content - Dec 06, 2011
- Bofors saga: a new twist and a story retold (Comment) - Apr 26, 2012
- Russian Wikipedia protests censorship plans - Jul 10, 2012
- All websites should operate within Indian laws: Pilot - Feb 07, 2012
Tags: arun jaitley, censorship, circulation, communist party of india, communist party of india marxist, cyber cafes, e mail, electronic media, fiasco, house of parliament, intermediaries, internet content, internet telecom, leader of opposition, libellous, money laundering, New Delhi, psychosis, rajya sabha, upper house of parliament