Gowda accuses apex court judge of bias, forces him to abandon lawsuit (Lead)
February 9th, 2009 - 8:40 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Feb 9 (IANS) A senior Supreme Court judge quit hearing a lawsuit on construction of the Bangalore-Mysore Expressway Monday after former prime minister H.D. Deve Gowda accused him of bias in favour of the promoters.
Gowda made the charges against Justice Arijit Pasayat in an application submitted by his counsel, former union law minister Shanti Bhushan.
“The applicant (Deve Gowda), through this application, seeks recusal of Justice Pasayat from hearing the present matter as he has reasonable apprehension of bias and want of impartiality (on his part) based on the relevant material in his possession,” said Gowda in his application to the court.
Upset by the plea, Justice Pasayat abandoned hearing the matter and transferred the lawsuit to Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan to assign it to a different bench.
Deve Gowda made the allegation days after Justice Pasayat rebuked him last week for trying to influence higher judiciary judges by sending them booklets and letters purportedly detailing various acts of fraud committed by the promoters of the expressway project, Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd (NICE), against the judiciary.
The former prime minister is also one of the parties in the matter and is opposing implementation of the project. He is entitled to have his say in the adjudication of the lawsuit filed by NICE seeking direction to the Karnataka government to help it implement the project expeditiously.
Gowda, in his application, said NICE had always been striving to have the matter heard only by a bench with Justice Pasayat on it.
To substantiate his allegations, Deve Gowda referred to two pleas by NICE last year, one oral and another written, made respectively to Chief Justice Balakrishnan and Justice Agrawal to have its various applications related to the lawsuit transferred to the court of Justice Pasayat.
The NICE sought a court direction to launch contempt to court proceedings against seven state government officials who allegedly derailed the project and foiled its implementation despite an April 2006 order by the apex court to execute the project. The expressway project was first conceived in 1997.
The expressway, estimated to cost Rs 28.5 billion (about $630 million), will reduce the distance between Bangalore and Mysore by 40-50 km, and cut travel time by 60-90 minutes from three-four hours currently.
A change at the helm of affairs in Karnataka put the project in cold storage.
The project ran into trouble from displaced farmers, NGOs and politicians, led by Deve Gowda, who urged the previous Congress-led government to stall the venture to protect farm lands and check the company’s “real estate” plans.
- Apex court judge quits hearing on Bangalore-Mysore expressway - Feb 09, 2009
- Karnataka asked to explain stand on Nice project - Jan 11, 2010
- Apex court questions Karnataka on road project - Jul 21, 2011
- Gowda fires another salvo at Yeddyurappa - Jan 11, 2010
- Apex court criticises Deve Gowda for trying to influence judges - Feb 04, 2009
- Apex court asks Karnataka to expedite corridor project - Oct 27, 2009
- Corridor dispute: It's over land, stupid! (Lead, With image) - Jan 12, 2010
- Centre of 'bloody' row BMIC 15 years in making (With image) - Jan 12, 2010
- Deve Gowda heads farmers to Delhi rally - Mar 07, 2010
- Supreme Court slaps Rs.10 lakh fine on frivolous litigant - Feb 02, 2011
- Supreme Court bench recuses itself from plea against OBC quota (Lead) - Jul 27, 2011
- Impeachment proceedings against Justice Dinakaran stayed - Apr 29, 2011
- Gowda now admits 'bloody b..' was against Yeddyurappa - Jan 11, 2010
- BJP workers across Karnataka protest Gowda's foul language - Jan 11, 2010
- SC Bench recuses itself from hearing Dinakaran plea - Apr 28, 2011
Tags: adjudication, allegation, apex court, apprehension, booklets, chief justice, contempt, court direction, court of justice, expressway project, former prime minister, impartiality, judiciary, karnataka government, promoters, relevant material, shanti, supreme court judge, union law minister, year one