Centre backs Bihar’s running of MPLADS schemesJuly 13th, 2012 - 11:00 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, July 13 (IANS) The central government Friday told the Supreme Court that the procedure adopted by Bihar for implementing the MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) was within the guidelines and in no way affected its operation.
A bench of Justice D.K. Jain and Justice Madan B. Lokur was told that “no adverse effect in the implementation of MPLADS is perceived on account of procedure prescribed under the resolution”, adopted by the Bihar government Nov 10, 2011.
The affidavit filed by the central government told the court that though the MPLADS was fully funded by the central government but the state governments could frame their procedure in line with the scheme for its implementation.
Under the MPLADS, every member of parliament is entitled to sanction works of public interest in his constituency to the tune of Rs.5 crore per annum.
The central government’s stand was in response to a petition by the BJP Lok Sabha member Capt. Jai Narayan Prasad Nishad, challenging the procedure framed by the Bihar government for the implementation of MPLADS.
Appearing for Nishad, senior counsel Jayant Bhushan told the court that the procedure framed by the Bihar government by its resolution Nov 10, 2011, conflicted with the guidelines framed by the central government for the implementation of the scheme.
The senior counsel contended that the state government could not lay down procedure on the spending of the funds under the MPLADS for members of parliament.
The court asked him what could be his (petitioner) objection when central government had no objection to Bihar’s procedure. “If the fund provider has no difficulty, how do we come in the picture,” Justice Jain asked Bhushan.
Responding to the poser by the court, Bhushan argued that “it was a grant that was sanctioned by the parliament for the parliamentarians and executive (government) nod could not cure the legal infirmity created by Bihar procedure”.
Pointing out that state government had laid down the procedure with the concurrence of the central government, Justice Jain told Bhushan that the court “is not a forum to decide how will it (MPLADS) be spent”.
Bhushan told the court that Bihar government’s procedure may veto the project proposed by the members of parliament from Bihar in their respective constituencies.
The court asked him to cite the instance where such a situation has arisen. Not ready with an instant answer, Bhushan sought some time to find some instances.
The court then adjourned the hearing for three weeks.
- Notice to Bihar on new norms for MP's development funds - Feb 21, 2012
- MP local area development scheme valid: Apex Court (Second Lead) - May 06, 2010
- Legal validity of MP local area development scheme upheld (Lead) - May 06, 2010
- Government relaxes MPs' fund norms - Jun 16, 2011
- MPs can now spend up to Rs.10 lakh on physically disabled - May 06, 2011
- South Sudan seeks Indian help in parliamentary work (With images) - Jul 13, 2012
- Rape victims to get monetary compensation - Mar 09, 2011
- MPLADS constitutionally valid, says Supreme Court - May 06, 2010
- 'Right to fair trial can't overshadow freedom of speech' - Apr 17, 2012
- Government didn't prevent NREGS fund diversion: Apex court (Lead) - Dec 13, 2010
- Don't be party to curtailing press freedom: Shanti Bhushan (Lead) - Apr 10, 2012
- Declare a calamity severe in three days, says panel - Aug 14, 2012
- Guidelines on media would amount to judicial over-reach, SC told - May 04, 2012
- Supreme Court reserves verdict on Dinakaran's petition (Lead) - Jun 01, 2011
- Videograph court proceedings to ensure accurate reporting: Prashant Bhushan - Apr 22, 2012
Tags: adverse effect, bihar government, bjp, central government, development scheme, executive government, fund provider, government nod, infirmity, justice jain, lok sabha member, madan, member of parliament, members of parliament, narayan, parliamentarians, petitioner, senior counsel, state gov, state governments