BJP press for adjournment motion on price rise
July 27th, 2010 - 7:44 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, July 27 (IANS) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Tuesday said it will again give notice Wednesday in both houses of parliament for an adjournment motion on the price rise under rules that entail voting.
“We will bring adjournment motion tomorrow. Nothing short of adjournment motion is acceptable,” BJP deputy leader in the Lok Sabha Gopinath Munde told reporters here.
The government says it is ready for a discussion on the issue but not as an adjournment motion.
The motions will be moved under rule 56 in the Lok Sabha and under rule 168 in the Rajya Sabha that require voting. While the government has adequate numbers in the Lok Sabha to defeat the adjournment motion, the situation in the Rajya Sabha is tricky.
The government and its allies can count on 89 members and the opposition on 104 in the upper house. However, the swing votes of 51 members belonging to parties like the Samajwadi Party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Bahujan Samaj Party, as also smaller parties and independent and nominated members, could make a difference.
The three parties have, in the past, sided with the government but given the general anger over the issue within and outside parliament, they could well decide to vote with the opposition to ensure the adjournment motion passes.
Since the voting is not on a money bill, the government would not have to resign if the adjournment passes. It would, however, be a huge embarassment for the government.
Asked whether the BJP had held talks with the Left parties, Munde said the opposition party leaders held “floor level discussions” on the issue and the entire opposition is united over the issue.
“All oppostion parties are together. We are confident,” he added.
“A voting on adjournment motion would reveal who is with the common man and who is not,” Munde said when asked if Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav and Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Lalu Prasad Yadav would vote against the government if voting takes place.
The two Yadavs, who had pressed for a cut motion demanding a roll-back of the fuel price hike during budget session of parliament, had staged a walk out when it was put to vote.
Munde said the parliamentary party meeting of the BJP had decided to seek a discussion on issues like the Bhopal gas tragedy, misuse of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the law and order situation in Delhi, train accidents and Maoist violence.
- Mulayam non-committal, if voting held - Jul 27, 2010
- Price rise storm hits parliament, both houses adjourned (Lead) - Jul 27, 2010
- Parliament adjourned for day over FDI in retail - Nov 28, 2011
- NDA to back Left in parliament over price rise - Nov 20, 2011
- Government should agree to adjournment motion if confident of majority: CPI-M - Jul 27, 2010
- BJP stages protest in parliament complex - Sep 08, 2011
- Lok Sabha adjourned over price rise issue - Feb 23, 2010
- Day 3 in Parliament: No work, logjam on over price rise, Telangana - Nov 24, 2011
- Opposition steals show in parliament on first day (Intro Roundup) - Jul 27, 2010
- Uproar over price rise stalls parliament (Roundup) - Jul 27, 2010
- Opposition can't dictate terms on policy decisions: Congress - Nov 28, 2011
- Lokpal in Rajya Sabha, Congress in Trinamool tangle (Roundup) - Dec 28, 2011
- Stormy start to parliament, 8 Congress MPs suspended (Roundup) - Apr 24, 2012
- Opposition to target Centre on price rise issue in Lok Sabha - Feb 23, 2010
- UPA tries hard to solve parliament logjam, contacts Mulayam (Lead) - Nov 24, 2011
Tags: adequate numbers, adjournment motion, bahujan samaj party, bharatiya janata party, common man, deputy leader, embarassment, gopinath munde, houses of parliament, left parties, level discussions, Lok Sabha, money bill, opposition party leaders, party leader, rajya sabha, Samajwadi Party, swing votes, upper house, yadav