Having more competitors ‘lowers motivation to compete’
December 4th, 2009 - 4:22 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Dec 4 (ANI): Motivation and performance is weakened when competition is against a large group of people, according to one of the findings of a series of new studies carried out by scientists at the University of Haifa and the University of Michigan.
“It is a well-established fact that subjective factors influence our motivation to compete. Our recent studies have shown that objective factors, such as the size of a competing group, also have an effect on motivation,” said Dr. Avishalom Tor from the University of Haifa’s Faculty of Law.
The first study investigated the grades of the SAT university entrance examination across the USA.
The scientists divided the number of examinees in each state by the number of sites where the test was held in that state, to determine the average number of examinees per site in each state.
The researchers took into consideration differences between the states in relevant socio-economic variables, finding that the lower the average number of students being examined at the sites of a given state, the higher the average score in that state.
Seeing as it is difficult to make assumptions based on averages calculated at a state level, a second and more focused study was carried out.
This time, the results were gathered from a psychological test, known as the Cognitive Reflection Test, that was taken by 1,383 students at the University of Michigan.
The data was assembled from 22 different sittings of the same test over the course of three years, when it was known not only how many examinees were taking the test at each session but also their individual grades and demographic variables.
This individual-level data similarly showed that the fewer the examinees at a specific session, the higher the average results.
A third study consisted of a controlled survey. The experiment asked 74 students to take a short, timed quiz when sitting alone.
Half the students were told they belonged to a group of 10 students taking the quiz, while the other half were told there were 100 examinees in total. They were also told that the first 20 percent to complete the test - without compromising the accuracy of their answers - would be given 5 dollars.
The results showed that students who thought they were competing against 9 others completed their tests significantly faster than those who thought they were competing against 99 others, although the accuracy of the responses did not differ between the groups. (ANI)
- Competing against large numbers subdues performance - Dec 07, 2009
- Bilinguals find it easier to learn a third language: Study - Feb 02, 2011
- Depressed partner cannot perceive the other's feelings - Mar 31, 2011
- Motivation to exercise can fluctuate - Feb 14, 2012
- Lack of motivation, equipment decreases physical activity in boys - Mar 31, 2011
- Personality can tell who's more likely to cheat - Sep 08, 2010
- Writing about worries can combat test anxiety and improve performance - Jan 14, 2011
- Building character skills key to improved education - Jan 02, 2012
- China tests people's proficiency in Mandarin - Dec 26, 2011
- Scientists crack ancient bone disease - Jan 04, 2012
- Study examines what employers are really looking for in candidates - Feb 23, 2011
- Twitter can give a boost to students' grades - Nov 14, 2010
- Women's depression can erode their intimate relationships - Mar 31, 2011
- Virtual partner better for workouts - May 23, 2011
- Blogging relieves teens of social anxiety - Jan 05, 2012
Tags: assumptions, consideration differences, demographic variables, economic variables, faculty of law, haifa, large group, motivation, objective factors, psychological test, quiz, reflection, scientists, score, sittings, subjective factors, tor, university entrance examination, university of haifa, university of michigan
