Wikipedia under fire for showing dressed-up porn
September 9th, 2008 - 2:41 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )Melbourne, Sept 9 (ANI): The biggest multilingual free-content encyclopaedia on the Internet, Wikipedia has come under fire for allowing pornographic images and videos in its articles.
In fact, some of the site’’s own editors have confessed that the objected content is dressed-up porn.
Using Wikipedia, instead of dictionaries, for looking up dirty words can expose children to images and videos of masturbation, “hardcore” sex and orgies, according to child protection campaigners.
One entry on the site shows an 18-second video of a man ejaculating, and that too, without any warnings or age verification.
While one page results in showing various photos from the sets of both a heterosexual and homosexual “hardcore” pornography films, another page features several images of masturbation.
Despite it being used by millions around the world, Wikipedia has been questioned since a long time for the accuracy and appropriateness of its content
According to a Wikipedia editor, who wants to get the ejaculation video removed has said that the concerned clip is “overkill”.
“A video of a woman giving herself a breast exam would be educational and … a video of a man giving himself a testicle exam would be educational” in relevant articles. Images alone are not enough for those processes, but a video of a man ejaculating - when there is an image that shows it stage by stage - is not needed, News.com.au quoted the user, as saying.
Childwise head Bernadette McMenamin said that sex education is “a good thing”, but an overt display of sexualised images in an online encyclopaedia “crosses the line”.
“Does that mean that when you type in ”murder”, you should actually see someone murdering someone else? Do we really need to see a woman masturbating on Wikipedia? Do we really need to see so many seconds of ejaculation?” she said.
Wikipedia however, has no policy of no censorship in the contents posted on the pages.
“Obviously inappropriate content (such as an irrelevant link to a shock site, or clear vandalism) is usually removed quickly. However, some articles may include objectionable text, images, or links where they are relevant to the content - such as the articles about the penis or pornography,” said the site. (ANI)
- Wikipedia becomes home base for paedophiles - Jun 27, 2010
- Wikipedia eases editing restrictions on controversial pages - Jun 16, 2010
- New technology automatically updates online data - Nov 30, 2011
- Study suggests that ichthyosaurs might have been food for the Sea monster Kraken - Oct 11, 2011
- Lindsay Lohan Dead Rumors Hit Web - Jul 15, 2010
- Wikimedia still hosting some pornographic images of children - May 11, 2010
- Maps on Wikipedia depict people's view: Founder - Nov 18, 2011
- UK academics want to turn Wikipedia into official research tool - Mar 23, 2011
- Is Wikipedia heading for bust? - Aug 05, 2009
- Wikipedia says blackout was a success - Jan 19, 2012
- Wikipedia shuts for 24 hours - Jan 18, 2012
- Wikipedia Faced Technical Difficulties Due To Power Outage - Jul 05, 2010
- Wikimedia slammed for pornographic content on website - May 08, 2010
- Wikipedia to shut down website for 24 hours - Jan 17, 2012
- Chaos at Wikipedia in wake of porn purging activity - May 15, 2010
Tags: age verification, breast exam, dirty words, ejaculating, hardcore pornography, news com au, online encyclopaedia, pornographic images, relevant articles, sex education