Why we fail to keep our New Years resolutionsNovember 18th, 2008 - 2:20 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, November 18 (ANI): Peoples failure to keep their New Years resolutions to lose weight or curb luxury spending may be due to the way their goals intersect with our natures, according to a new study.
Cait Poynor of the University of Pittsburgh and Kelly L. Haws of Texas A&M University, the researchers who led the path breaking study, say that the purpose of their research was to find out why some people have more trouble than others regulating behaviours.
Writing about their findings in the Journal of Consumer Research, they said that their study uncovered some important differences in the way people categorised “necessities” and “luxuries”.
“The data demonstrates the basic differences among consumers in their tendency to embrace indulgence or restriction goals. Even when pursuing the same goal, high and low self-control consumers create dramatically different categories of goal-consistent and goal-inconsistent options,” the authors wrote.
The research team conducted three studies to examine the process individuals cycled through, when trying to make a change.
They say that, first, people select goals, and then they form “implementation intentions”, deciding which options and behaviours are consistent with the goals.
“For example, you might make a budget, deciding which items are necessities and which are luxuries, buy a diet book, which tells you which foods you may and may not eat, or organize your weekly schedule to include work sessions and time to participate in leisure activities,” the authors say.
“Importantly, results suggest that the goal pursuit process can appear to proceed smoothly but in fact be derailed during this second phase,” they add.
The team found that people would get tripped up when their goals required them to overcome their default tendencies.
According to them, the subjects who were categorised as having “low self-control” tended to do better with “indulgence goals”, like enjoying purchases more.
On the other hand, those with higher self-control preferred “restriction goals” that led them to categorize fewer items as necessities, the researchers said.
“The most effective self-control interventions may vary depending on one’’s selfcontrol level and the nature of one’’s chosen goal,” the authors conclude. (ANI)
- Eating wisely calls for self-control: Study - Sep 12, 2012
- Don't mortgage present 'enriching' choices to future woes: study - Sep 16, 2008
- Warm parenting offers hope for callous, unemotional kids - Jul 25, 2012
- Misplaced motivation could bring on failures - Mar 15, 2012
- Scan reveals what brain looks like when you are angry - Jun 19, 2012
- Pride makes some indulge, others cautious - Nov 16, 2010
- Is choice really a matter of free will - or presentation? - Oct 14, 2009
- When buying for others, consumers go for less healthy food items - Mar 23, 2010
- Happy people go for candies - Apr 20, 2011
- Watching favourite TV shows' rerun could boost mind - Sep 08, 2012
- Feeling angry? Blame the diet - Mar 20, 2011
- Pride in achievement makes consumers choose French fries over salad - Nov 16, 2010
- Decisions for self-control or indulgence depend on presentation of choices - Oct 14, 2009
- Religion gives people more self-control - Jan 25, 2012
- How going on a diet can provoke anger - Mar 19, 2011
Tags: amp, diet book, goal pursuit, haws, indulgence, journal of consumer research, leisure activities, luxuries, m university, natures, necessities, new years resolutions, poynor, restriction, second phase, self control, tendencies, tendency, university of pittsburgh, work sessions